When comparing Ethernet address it is better to use the more generic batadv_compare_eth. The latter is also optimised for architectures having a fast unaligned access.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com --- network-coding.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/network-coding.c b/network-coding.c index f1b604d..0049e7a 100644 --- a/network-coding.c +++ b/network-coding.c @@ -481,12 +481,10 @@ static int batadv_nc_hash_compare(const struct hlist_node *node, nc_path2 = data2;
/* Return 1 if the two keys are identical */ - if (memcmp(nc_path1->prev_hop, nc_path2->prev_hop, - sizeof(nc_path1->prev_hop)) != 0) + if (!batadv_compare_eth(nc_path1->prev_hop, nc_path2->prev_hop)) return 0;
- if (memcmp(nc_path1->next_hop, nc_path2->next_hop, - sizeof(nc_path1->next_hop)) != 0) + if (!batadv_compare_eth(nc_path1->next_hop, nc_path2->next_hop)) return 0;
return 1;
On 05/01/14 12:36, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
When comparing Ethernet address it is better to use the more generic batadv_compare_eth. The latter is also optimised for architectures having a fast unaligned access.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com
Martin,
I forgot to add you to the CC list :) Sorry!
Cheers,
On Sunday 05 January 2014 12:36:49 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
When comparing Ethernet address it is better to use the more generic batadv_compare_eth. The latter is also optimised for architectures having a fast unaligned access.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com
It looks like this patch doesn't apply anymore. Can you please resent it or mark it correctly in patchwork [1].
But for the cleanup:
Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org
Thanks, Sven
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org