orig_hash_find() manages rcu_lock/unlock internally and doesn't need to be surrounded by rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() anymore
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli ordex@autistici.org --- routing.c | 6 ------ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c index f6c6422..634a44d 100644 --- a/routing.c +++ b/routing.c @@ -1310,14 +1310,11 @@ int route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) }
/* get routing information */ - rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, unicast_packet->dest);
if (!orig_node) goto unlock;
- rcu_read_unlock(); - /* find_router() increases neigh_nodes refcount if found. */ neigh_node = find_router(bat_priv, orig_node, recv_if);
@@ -1464,14 +1461,11 @@ int recv_bcast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) if (bcast_packet->ttl < 2) goto out;
- rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, bcast_packet->orig);
if (!orig_node) goto rcu_unlock;
- rcu_read_unlock(); - spin_lock_bh(&orig_node->bcast_seqno_lock);
/* check whether the packet is a duplicate */
Antonio Quartulli wrote:
orig_hash_find() manages rcu_lock/unlock internally and doesn't need to be surrounded by rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() anymore
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli ordex@autistici.org
Valid point, but incorrect implementation
routing.c | 6 ------ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c index f6c6422..634a44d 100644 --- a/routing.c +++ b/routing.c @@ -1310,14 +1310,11 @@ int route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) }
/* get routing information */
rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, unicast_packet->dest);
if (!orig_node) goto unlock;
rcu_read_unlock();
You forgot to fix the rcu_read_unlock after the label unlock.
/* find_router() increases neigh_nodes refcount if found. */ neigh_node = find_router(bat_priv, orig_node, recv_if);
@@ -1464,14 +1461,11 @@ int recv_bcast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) if (bcast_packet->ttl < 2) goto out;
rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, bcast_packet->orig);
if (!orig_node) goto rcu_unlock;
rcu_read_unlock();
spin_lock_bh(&orig_node->bcast_seqno_lock);
/* check whether the packet is a duplicate */
You forgot to fix the rcu_read_unlock after the label rcu_unlock.
Kind regards, Sven
orig_hash_find() manages rcu_lock/unlock internally and doesn't need to be surrounded by rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() anymore
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli ordex@autistici.org --- routing.c | 16 ++-------------- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c index f6c6422..2d77bd3 100644 --- a/routing.c +++ b/routing.c @@ -1310,13 +1310,10 @@ int route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) }
/* get routing information */ - rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, unicast_packet->dest);
if (!orig_node) - goto unlock; - - rcu_read_unlock(); + goto out;
/* find_router() increases neigh_nodes refcount if found. */ neigh_node = find_router(bat_priv, orig_node, recv_if); @@ -1362,10 +1359,7 @@ int route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) /* route it */ send_skb_packet(skb, neigh_node->if_incoming, neigh_node->addr); ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS; - goto out;
-unlock: - rcu_read_unlock(); out: if (neigh_node) neigh_node_free_ref(neigh_node); @@ -1464,13 +1458,10 @@ int recv_bcast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) if (bcast_packet->ttl < 2) goto out;
- rcu_read_lock(); orig_node = orig_hash_find(bat_priv, bcast_packet->orig);
if (!orig_node) - goto rcu_unlock; - - rcu_read_unlock(); + goto out;
spin_lock_bh(&orig_node->bcast_seqno_lock);
@@ -1501,9 +1492,6 @@ int recv_bcast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS; goto out;
-rcu_unlock: - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto out; spin_unlock: spin_unlock_bh(&orig_node->bcast_seqno_lock); out:
On Saturday 16 April 2011 11:30:57 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
orig_hash_find() manages rcu_lock/unlock internally and doesn't need to be surrounded by rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() anymore
Applied in revision ffe4329.
Thanks, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org