On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:43:35PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
On Sunday, February 19, 2012 22:54:19 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
I was wondering...what about adding a "payload_size" field to the new packet?
The handling code would probably be generic enough to handle any future change leading to a more stable compat_version (instead of increasing its value everyday).
What will be the purpose of the payload field ?
After discussing this on IRC we came up with not introducing this field. Actually we don't need it so it's not worth bloating the packet format now.
Cheers!