4 Dec
2007
4 Dec
'07
4:03 a.m.
Hi Axel
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0100, Axel Neumann wrote:
...
I am just curious, can you confirm if the following correctly
describes the HNA/SNAT of your setup:
for the two-way-tunnel setup:
- you were doing SNAT at Cs' upstream interface AND at Bs' bat0 interface
MASQUERADE
- Can you describe it in way that i can reproduce
it ?
A---B---C
A: your computer
B: bmxd_rv804 client node }
}running 2-way-tunnel
C: bmxd_rv804 gw node }
for the one-way tunnel setup:
- you are only doing SNAT at Cs' upstream interface
no, i still do MASQUERADE
also on Bs' bat0, because i was too lazy to
comment it out ;-)
- and additionally an HNA announcement by B for the
address used by A
yes, but also with 2-way-tunnel (because i want net internal
routing)
cheers
--Jan