Hi,
Are recent batman-acv versions unusable with 3.10 or 3.8 kernels?
The reason i'm asking is that with 2104.1.0 with two connected sta after restarting the wifi
(also the same if restarting all the network) it gives the following message:
root@Laguna1:/etc/config# wifi
[37620.920000] batman_adv: bat0: Interface deactivated: adhoc0
[37621.140000] batman_adv: bat0: Removing interface: adhoc0
[37621.250000] br-mesh: port 2(bat0) entered disabled state
[37621.250000] device bat0 left promiscuous mode
[37621.260000] br-mesh: port 2(bat0) entered disabled state
[37631.340000] unregister_netdevice: waiting for adhoc0 to become free. Usage count = 1
[37641.390000] unregister_netdevice: waiting for adhoc0 to become free. Usage count = 1
[37651.410000] unregister_netdevice: waiting for adhoc0 to become free. Usage count = 1
…
And only restarting is possible to get the device back to work.
Going back to 2014.0.0 it's worst with the system being very unstable and continuously restarting.
After following the instructions from cmsv <cmsv(a)wirelesspt.net>
and replacing the feeds.conf with
src-git routing https://github.com/libre-mesh/openwrt-routing-packages
I was able to compile the 2013.4.0 release which is very stable.
But I really would like the vlan support from recent releases.
My systems are:
Laguna board
OpenWrt trunk r38938
batctl 2013.4.0 [batman-adv: 2013.4.0]
Linux Laguna1 3.8.13 #6 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:10:18 WET 2014 armv6l GNU/Linux
Router station
OpenWrt trunk r38938
batctl 2013.4.0 [batman-adv: 2013.4.0]
Linux RSPro2 3.10.18 #2 Thu Mar 27 18:24:29 WET 2014 mips GNU/Linux
Thanks in advance,
Bruno
Hi all,
I have two devices (Ubiquiti PicoStation M2 and Ubiquiti NanoStation M5)
mounted on the same pole both running libre-mesh [1] firmware
(batman-adv: 2014.1.0) and both attached to a Mikrotik RB250GS gigabit
switch (latest 1.11 firmware, default configuration) which is attached
to my pc [2].
When isolated (turning off the port of the other device via the switch
interface), both Ubiquiti devices doesn't see any other device with
batman neither have any client connected.
Both the devices independently (also when are isolated) print the same
error in dmesg:
br-lan: received packet on bat0 with own address as source address
This error is an indication that batman loop avoidance has some
problems, right?
Obviously loop avoidance is enabled.
# batctl bl
enabled
Various interfaces are bridged, for example in PicoStation I have:
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br-lan 7fff.dc9fdb31c136 no eth0
bat0
wlan0_ap
I noticed that I'm not the first to ask here about this message [3][4].
I attach to this email dmesg form both isolated devices,
/etc/config/network, ip a, ifconfig, brctl and info from batctl.
Thanks,
Ilario
[1] http://libre-mesh.org/projects/libre-mesh
[2] https://github.com/ilario/configurazione-ilario-fisso
[3]
https://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2012-February/006234.html
[4]
https://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2013-October/010770.html