Is there a configuration setting for batman-adv to timeout on a connection? i.e. if I lose a node in my network, I noticed it took a long time for that node to leave the originators list. What is this based on or in other words when does batman-adv declare the lost originator gone?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:40:25AM -0500, ecfu wrote:
Is there a configuration setting for batman-adv to timeout on a connection? i.e. if I lose a node in my network, I noticed it took a long time for that node to leave the originators list. What is this based on or in other words when does batman-adv declare the lost originator gone?
An originator is purged when it has not been heard from in
#define PURGE_TIMEOUT 200000 /* purge originators after time in ms if no * valid packet comes in.
is 200s = 3.3 minutes.
Andrew
Is there something special about this number?
If I need a faster response say 1 minute or even 30 seconds, is that a bad idea?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:40:25AM -0500, ecfu wrote:
Is there a configuration setting for batman-adv to timeout on a
connection?
i.e. if I lose a node in my network, I noticed it took a long time for
that
node to leave the originators list. What is this based on or in other
words
when does batman-adv declare the lost originator gone?
An originator is purged when it has not been heard from in
#define PURGE_TIMEOUT 200000 /* purge originators after time in ms if no * valid packet comes in.
is 200s = 3.3 minutes.
Andrew _______________________________________________ B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@lists.open-mesh.org https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
Because I am dealing with rapidly changing networks, like to the point where applications could be complete in less than 3 minutes
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_marek@yahoo.dewrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 10:32:46 ecfu wrote:
Is there something special about this number?
If I need a faster response say 1 minute or even 30 seconds, is that a
bad
idea?
I'd be interested to understand why you think a smaller number would be beneficial.
Regards, Marek _______________________________________________ B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@lists.open-mesh.org https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:34:08AM -0500, ecfu wrote:
Because I am dealing with rapidly changing networks, like to the point where applications could be complete in less than 3 minutes
This still does not explain why the entry is a problem.
Please could you explain in a bit more detail what you think the problem is?
Thanks Andrew
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
Andrew Lunn -
ecfu -
Marek Lindner