Reported by checkpatch with the following warning: WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com --- bat_iv_ogm.c | 13 +++++++------ distributed-arp-table.c | 3 ++- hash.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c index f04224c..1e80539 100644 --- a/bat_iv_ogm.c +++ b/bat_iv_ogm.c @@ -108,14 +108,15 @@ static int batadv_iv_ogm_orig_add_if(struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node, int max_if_num) { void *data_ptr; - size_t data_size, old_size; + size_t old_size; int ret = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_bh(&orig_node->bat_iv.ogm_cnt_lock);
- data_size = max_if_num * sizeof(unsigned long) * BATADV_NUM_WORDS; old_size = (max_if_num - 1) * sizeof(unsigned long) * BATADV_NUM_WORDS; - data_ptr = kmalloc(data_size, GFP_ATOMIC); + data_ptr = kmalloc_array(max_if_num, + BATADV_NUM_WORDS * sizeof(unsigned long), + GFP_ATOMIC); if (!data_ptr) goto unlock;
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int batadv_iv_ogm_orig_add_if(struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node, kfree(orig_node->bat_iv.bcast_own); orig_node->bat_iv.bcast_own = data_ptr;
- data_ptr = kmalloc(max_if_num * sizeof(uint8_t), GFP_ATOMIC); + data_ptr = kmalloc_array(max_if_num, sizeof(uint8_t), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!data_ptr) { kfree(orig_node->bat_iv.bcast_own); goto unlock; @@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static int batadv_iv_ogm_orig_del_if(struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node, goto free_bcast_own;
chunk_size = sizeof(unsigned long) * BATADV_NUM_WORDS; - data_ptr = kmalloc(max_if_num * chunk_size, GFP_ATOMIC); + data_ptr = kmalloc_array(max_if_num, chunk_size, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!data_ptr) goto unlock;
@@ -183,7 +184,7 @@ free_bcast_own: if (max_if_num == 0) goto free_own_sum;
- data_ptr = kmalloc(max_if_num * sizeof(uint8_t), GFP_ATOMIC); + data_ptr = kmalloc_array(max_if_num, sizeof(uint8_t), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!data_ptr) { kfree(orig_node->bat_iv.bcast_own); goto unlock; diff --git a/distributed-arp-table.c b/distributed-arp-table.c index dcd99b2..b7406e0 100644 --- a/distributed-arp-table.c +++ b/distributed-arp-table.c @@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ batadv_dat_select_candidates(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, __be32 ip_dst) if (!bat_priv->orig_hash) return NULL;
- res = kmalloc(BATADV_DAT_CANDIDATES_NUM * sizeof(*res), GFP_ATOMIC); + res = kmalloc_array(BATADV_DAT_CANDIDATES_NUM, sizeof(*res), + GFP_ATOMIC); if (!res) return NULL;
diff --git a/hash.c b/hash.c index 63bdf7e..7c1c630 100644 --- a/hash.c +++ b/hash.c @@ -46,12 +46,12 @@ struct batadv_hashtable *batadv_hash_new(uint32_t size) if (!hash) return NULL;
- hash->table = kmalloc(sizeof(*hash->table) * size, GFP_ATOMIC); + hash->table = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(*hash->table), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!hash->table) goto free_hash;
- hash->list_locks = kmalloc(sizeof(*hash->list_locks) * size, - GFP_ATOMIC); + hash->list_locks = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(*hash->list_locks), + GFP_ATOMIC); if (!hash->list_locks) goto free_table;
On Saturday 24 May 2014 06:43:47 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Reported by checkpatch with the following warning: WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com
bat_iv_ogm.c | 13 +++++++------ distributed-arp-table.c | 3 ++- hash.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Applied in revision d979cae.
Thanks, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org