Send B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list submissions to b.a.t.m.a.n(a)lists.open-mesh.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to b.a.t.m.a.n-request(a)lists.open-mesh.org You can reach the person managing the list at b.a.t.m.a.n-owner(a)lists.open-mesh.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of B.A.T.M.A.N digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) (Linus L?ssing) 2. Re: Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) (Thomas Pedersen) 3. Re: Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) (Yeoh Chun-Yeow) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 15:07:06 +0200 From: Linus L?ssing <linus.luessing(a)web.de&gt; To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n(a)lists.open-mesh.org&gt; Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) Message-ID: <20130510130706.GA11726@Linus-Debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Ajeet, As far as I know it is not possible to have a virtual 802.11s mesh and an IBSS interface at the same time with the ath5k/ath9k (at least I think that was the case during the Wireless BattleMesh v6). You might need to run tests one after the other or you could try to make the ath5k/9k VAP patches [1],[2],[3] to not only work for IBSS but also mesh mode. Cheers, Linus [1]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/410-ath9k_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch [2]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/411-ath5k_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch [3]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/412-mac80211_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 08:56:27AM +0530, ajeet singh wrote: > Dear all, > > I have done the set-up of Batman-adv. and 802.11s in my lab. > I am comparing their working functionalities and performance > measurements (throughput etc.). > > Have anyone tested batman-adv. and 802.11s with same test setup (I > mean with same wireless chipsets)? > > Please provide me any related URLs. > > Thanks in advance. > > Thanks > Ajeet ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 16:40:44 -0700 From: Thomas Pedersen <thomas(a)cozybit.com&gt; To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n(a)lists.open-mesh.org&gt; Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) Message-ID: <CAG6hwVNYGxnO4rJoxBS387U0wuMEOnxLram4ZNq5rW4Ybx2SeQ(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ajeet, This should be possible with the patches Linus posted, but you'll probably need the one at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg107080.html as well. On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Linus L?ssing <linus.luessing(a)web.de&gt; wrote: > Hi Ajeet, > > As far as I know it is not possible to have a virtual 802.11s mesh > and an IBSS interface at the same time with the ath5k/ath9k (at least > I think that was the case during the Wireless BattleMesh v6). You > might need to run tests one after the other or you could try to make > the ath5k/9k VAP patches [1],[2],[3] to not only work for IBSS but > also mesh mode. > > Cheers, Linus > > [1]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/410-ath9k_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch > [2]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/411-ath5k_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch > [3]: openwrt/package/mac80211/patches/412-mac80211_allow_adhoc_and_ap.patch > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 08:56:27AM +0530, ajeet singh wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I have done the set-up of Batman-adv. and 802.11s in my lab. >> I am comparing their working functionalities and performance >> measurements (throughput etc.). >> >> Have anyone tested batman-adv. and 802.11s with same test setup (I >> mean with same wireless chipsets)? >> >> Please provide me any related URLs. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Thanks >> Ajeet -- Thomas ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 11:59:21 +0800 From: Yeoh Chun-Yeow <yeohchunyeow(a)gmail.com&gt; To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n(a)lists.open-mesh.org&gt; Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Performance Comparison (Batman-adv. vs. 802.11s) Message-ID: <CAEFj985diyOZstxbb5chNPXxQz4mswsaWPhD5_LqBfATuic4fQ(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Ajeet You can take a look on this paper [1] published in year 2010. [1] http://wwwtlc.iet.unipi.it/research/ggt-iswpc10.pdf ---- Chun-Yeow ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N(a)lists.open-mesh.org https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n ------------------------------ End of B.A.T.M.A.N Digest, Vol 77, Issue 12 *******************************************