Hi everyone,

For the NDP patches, the usage of the methods for determening the link qualities with the window is the code I'm most uncertain about (right after the fancy rcu-locking/refcounting ;) ).

Therefore I'd like to ask some questions about code in bitarray.c and routing.c that came to my mind while reading some of those parts and which parts confused me, partly due to their naming style I think. It's great though, that the purpose of the methods in bitarray.c are well explained, I'm just missing some minor cases that are not explained in their comment.

- for get_bit_status() it's especially not clear to me, what is meant with "in range" in its comment. is it supposed to be "in range" if it is after or before the last_seqno? - bit_get_packet(): just for clarification, if set_mark is set, that means the window can still be slided, but the bit for the according seqno in the window is not being set, right? (what do you think about adding a sentence about its purpose in this methods preceding comment?) - what does bit_get_packet() return in case of a not very old, but just old packet which is still inside of the window? (the comment does not seem to cover this case) - what do you think of renaming bit_get_packet() to something like update_window()? With function names having a "get" in their name I'd usually think that they'd not modify anything. And for instance renaming set_mark to "slide_only" or something else that might explain a little more the difference when setting or not setting it?

- for the need_update in the code, this is just refering to an updated last_real_seqno, right? need_update could also be 0 in case of a out-of-order and not too old ogm, right? (maybe renaming it to something like window_slided or update_last_rq_seqno?) - in count_real_packets(), why are the window update functions (bit_get_packet(), bit_packet_count()) still called in case of is_duplicate == 1?

Do you think it might make sense to add some more abstraction in routing.c to reduce the number of functions in bitarray.c you have to look at and their purpose you'd have to get your head around? To avoid having to think of the window operations in routing.c and abstract that part?

And one more question for the TQ_LOCAL_WINDOW_SIZE, when i.e. I'd change that to a lower value, for instance 4, I'd have to set WORD_BIT_SIZE to (sizeof(unsigned long) / 2), right? Would that cause any trouble on the code side (and yeah, I know that this is causing unusable link quality measurements, but I wanted to reduce that to play a little with an exponentially weighted moving average on top of that).

Cheers, Linus