Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
Hi Gioacchino,
As far as I know the format for the batman-adv vis output has not been changed on purpose and the wiki page should reflect the current specification. So you might possibly have found a bug.
So guessing from the link, you are testing this with two nodes (with two interfaces as you said) with perfect link qualities and the issue already comes up, correct?
It would be great if you could provide the following additional data from this two node setup: - The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data - The originator table of the two nodes from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
Cheers, Linus
ok the node number now is increased but we have the same bug :|
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 80, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 236, 00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 172, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 172, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 158, HNA 0a:ee:bf:7f:e8:fd, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 92, TQ 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 99, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 153, HNA f2:f8:44:0f:93:65, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:45, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 74, 00:15:6d:7a:97:08,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 145, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 207, HNA 00:18:84:1d:fc:78, HNA 1c:65:9d:cc:5a:7e, HNA 12:da:53:a1:68:55, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:08, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:72:48:0d,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 108, 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 172, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 193, 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 100, 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 245, HNA 78:e4:00:83:91:f4, HNA 00:14:0b:04:32:d1, HNA 00:0c:6e:34:5a:c9, HNA 00:50:fc:f0:62:f6, HNA 00:18:84:1e:94:dd, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:de, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:ba, HNA 00:26:9e:13:36:d4, HNA 00:1d:7e:a1:da:5c, HNA 00:16:d3:9a:38:13, HNA 08:10:74:a2:74:68, HNA 90:27:e4:a2:86:3a, HNA 00:0c:46:db:d2:bf, HNA 00:20:1a:22:ee:8f, HNA 1c:4b:d6:b7:58:8f, HNA 00:26:5e:21:6f:73, HNA 00:1e:8c:1c:d4:89, HNA 00:15:6d:73:48:0d, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:70, HNA 00:30:84:1d:55:27, HNA c4:17:fe:c1:dd:a8, HNA 00:1a:4b:76:72:64, HNA 58:b0:35:fd:65:b4, HNA 00:e0:4c:39:2b:0a, HNA 00:0c:46:b8:cc:2c, HNA 00:0a:5e:65:71:ff, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:8a, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:91, HNA 16:be:18:57:d3:24, HNA 1c:4b:d6:5c:05:f2, HNA 00:50:fc:cd:fa:c1, HNA 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e, PRIMARY,
- The originator table of the two nodes from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
mmm for all nodes now is quite complex :| here is the one from the node I use to get vis data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.710s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 69) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 1.450s ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 9) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 11) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 2.790s ( 15) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 15) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.240s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 41) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 0.310s ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.410s ( 18) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 18) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.260s ( 24) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 24) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.310s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 1.330s ( 35) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 29) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 35) 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 0.080s ( 45) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:72:48:0d ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 37) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.330s ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 0.970s ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 14)
root@OpenWrt:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.270s (120) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 (102) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (120) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 6.960s ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 18) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 6.690s ( 38) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.130s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 82) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.400s ( 45) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.370s ( 41) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 41) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.370s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 0.890s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 74) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.160s ( 61) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 56) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 61) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 1.560s ( 31) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 28) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 31)
2011/4/19 Linus Lüssing linus.luessing@web.de:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
Hi Gioacchino,
As far as I know the format for the batman-adv vis output has not been changed on purpose and the wiki page should reflect the current specification. So you might possibly have found a bug.
So guessing from the link, you are testing this with two nodes (with two interfaces as you said) with perfect link qualities and the issue already comes up, correct?
It would be great if you could provide the following additional data from this two node setup:
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
Cheers, Linus
Hi!
It seems the problem was a misconfiguration!
The problem was that batman was activated on eth0 but eth0 was already participating on the bat0 bridge telling batman to use the bridge instead of eth0 fixed everything :D
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
ok the node number now is increased but we have the same bug :|
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 80, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 236, 00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 172, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 172, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 158, HNA 0a:ee:bf:7f:e8:fd, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 92, TQ 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 99, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 153, HNA f2:f8:44:0f:93:65, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:45, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 74, 00:15:6d:7a:97:08,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 145, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 207, HNA 00:18:84:1d:fc:78, HNA 1c:65:9d:cc:5a:7e, HNA 12:da:53:a1:68:55, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:08, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:72:48:0d,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 108, 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 172, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 193, 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 100, 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 245, HNA 78:e4:00:83:91:f4, HNA 00:14:0b:04:32:d1, HNA 00:0c:6e:34:5a:c9, HNA 00:50:fc:f0:62:f6, HNA 00:18:84:1e:94:dd, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:de, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:ba, HNA 00:26:9e:13:36:d4, HNA 00:1d:7e:a1:da:5c, HNA 00:16:d3:9a:38:13, HNA 08:10:74:a2:74:68, HNA 90:27:e4:a2:86:3a, HNA 00:0c:46:db:d2:bf, HNA 00:20:1a:22:ee:8f, HNA 1c:4b:d6:b7:58:8f, HNA 00:26:5e:21:6f:73, HNA 00:1e:8c:1c:d4:89, HNA 00:15:6d:73:48:0d, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:70, HNA 00:30:84:1d:55:27, HNA c4:17:fe:c1:dd:a8, HNA 00:1a:4b:76:72:64, HNA 58:b0:35:fd:65:b4, HNA 00:e0:4c:39:2b:0a, HNA 00:0c:46:b8:cc:2c, HNA 00:0a:5e:65:71:ff, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:8a, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:91, HNA 16:be:18:57:d3:24, HNA 1c:4b:d6:5c:05:f2, HNA 00:50:fc:cd:fa:c1, HNA 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e, PRIMARY,
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
mmm for all nodes now is quite complex :| here is the one from the node I use to get vis data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.710s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 69) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 1.450s ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 9) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 11) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 2.790s ( 15) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 15) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.240s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 41) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 0.310s ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.410s ( 18) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 18) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.260s ( 24) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 24) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.310s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 1.330s ( 35) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 29) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 35) 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 0.080s ( 45) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:72:48:0d ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 37) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.330s ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 0.970s ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 14)
root@OpenWrt:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.270s (120) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 (102) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (120) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 6.960s ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 18) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 6.690s ( 38) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.130s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 82) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.400s ( 45) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.370s ( 41) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 41) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.370s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 0.890s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 74) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.160s ( 61) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 56) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 61) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 1.560s ( 31) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 28) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 31)
2011/4/19 Linus Lüssing linus.luessing@web.de:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
Hi Gioacchino,
As far as I know the format for the batman-adv vis output has not been changed on purpose and the wiki page should reflect the current specification. So you might possibly have found a bug.
So guessing from the link, you are testing this with two nodes (with two interfaces as you said) with perfect link qualities and the issue already comes up, correct?
It would be great if you could provide the following additional data from this two node setup:
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
Cheers, Linus
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:45:45AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
Hi!
It seems the problem was a misconfiguration!
The problem was that batman was activated on eth0 but eth0 was already participating on the bat0 bridge telling batman to use the bridge instead of eth0 fixed everything :D
Hey, nice :)!
Glad that it works now for you. Just one more question, you're saying that you "[told] batman to use the bridge" - you didn't add your bridge interface to batman, did you?
Cheers, Linus
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
ok the node number now is increased but we have the same bug :|
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 80, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 236, 00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 172, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 172, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 158, HNA 0a:ee:bf:7f:e8:fd, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 92, TQ 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 99, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 153, HNA f2:f8:44:0f:93:65, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:45, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 74, 00:15:6d:7a:97:08,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 145, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 207, HNA 00:18:84:1d:fc:78, HNA 1c:65:9d:cc:5a:7e, HNA 12:da:53:a1:68:55, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:08, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:72:48:0d,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 108, 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 172, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 193, 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 100, 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 245, HNA 78:e4:00:83:91:f4, HNA 00:14:0b:04:32:d1, HNA 00:0c:6e:34:5a:c9, HNA 00:50:fc:f0:62:f6, HNA 00:18:84:1e:94:dd, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:de, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:ba, HNA 00:26:9e:13:36:d4, HNA 00:1d:7e:a1:da:5c, HNA 00:16:d3:9a:38:13, HNA 08:10:74:a2:74:68, HNA 90:27:e4:a2:86:3a, HNA 00:0c:46:db:d2:bf, HNA 00:20:1a:22:ee:8f, HNA 1c:4b:d6:b7:58:8f, HNA 00:26:5e:21:6f:73, HNA 00:1e:8c:1c:d4:89, HNA 00:15:6d:73:48:0d, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:70, HNA 00:30:84:1d:55:27, HNA c4:17:fe:c1:dd:a8, HNA 00:1a:4b:76:72:64, HNA 58:b0:35:fd:65:b4, HNA 00:e0:4c:39:2b:0a, HNA 00:0c:46:b8:cc:2c, HNA 00:0a:5e:65:71:ff, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:8a, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:91, HNA 16:be:18:57:d3:24, HNA 1c:4b:d6:5c:05:f2, HNA 00:50:fc:cd:fa:c1, HNA 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e, PRIMARY,
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
mmm for all nodes now is quite complex :| here is the one from the node I use to get vis data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.710s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 69) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 1.450s ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 9) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 11) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 2.790s ( 15) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 15) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.240s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 41) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 0.310s ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.410s ( 18) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 18) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.260s ( 24) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 24) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.310s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 1.330s ( 35) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 29) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 35) 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 0.080s ( 45) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:72:48:0d ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 37) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.330s ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 0.970s ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 14)
root@OpenWrt:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.270s (120) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 (102) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (120) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 6.960s ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 18) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 6.690s ( 38) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.130s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 82) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.400s ( 45) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.370s ( 41) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 41) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.370s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 0.890s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 74) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.160s ( 61) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 56) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 61) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 1.560s ( 31) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 28) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 31)
2011/4/19 Linus Lüssing linus.luessing@web.de:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
Hi Gioacchino,
As far as I know the format for the batman-adv vis output has not been changed on purpose and the wiki page should reflect the current specification. So you might possibly have found a bug.
So guessing from the link, you are testing this with two nodes (with two interfaces as you said) with perfect link qualities and the issue already comes up, correct?
It would be great if you could provide the following additional data from this two node setup:
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
Cheers, Linus
you didn't add your bridge interface to batman, did you?
Yes on Marek suggestion i done batctl if add br-clients
instead of batctl if add eth0
br-clients = bat0 + eth0 [ + ath0 eventually ]
2011/4/21 Linus Lüssing linus.luessing@web.de:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:45:45AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
Hi!
It seems the problem was a misconfiguration!
The problem was that batman was activated on eth0 but eth0 was already participating on the bat0 bridge telling batman to use the bridge instead of eth0 fixed everything :D
Hey, nice :)!
Glad that it works now for you. Just one more question, you're saying that you "[told] batman to use the bridge" - you didn't add your bridge interface to batman, did you?
Cheers, Linus
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
ok the node number now is increased but we have the same bug :|
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 80, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 236, 00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 172, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 172, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 158, HNA 0a:ee:bf:7f:e8:fd, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 92, TQ 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 99, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 153, HNA f2:f8:44:0f:93:65, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:45, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 74, 00:15:6d:7a:97:08,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 145, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 207, HNA 00:18:84:1d:fc:78, HNA 1c:65:9d:cc:5a:7e, HNA 12:da:53:a1:68:55, HNA 00:15:6d:7b:97:08, PRIMARY, 00:15:6d:72:48:0d,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 108, 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 172, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 193, 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 100, 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 245, HNA 78:e4:00:83:91:f4, HNA 00:14:0b:04:32:d1, HNA 00:0c:6e:34:5a:c9, HNA 00:50:fc:f0:62:f6, HNA 00:18:84:1e:94:dd, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:de, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:ba, HNA 00:26:9e:13:36:d4, HNA 00:1d:7e:a1:da:5c, HNA 00:16:d3:9a:38:13, HNA 08:10:74:a2:74:68, HNA 90:27:e4:a2:86:3a, HNA 00:0c:46:db:d2:bf, HNA 00:20:1a:22:ee:8f, HNA 1c:4b:d6:b7:58:8f, HNA 00:26:5e:21:6f:73, HNA 00:1e:8c:1c:d4:89, HNA 00:15:6d:73:48:0d, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:70, HNA 00:30:84:1d:55:27, HNA c4:17:fe:c1:dd:a8, HNA 00:1a:4b:76:72:64, HNA 58:b0:35:fd:65:b4, HNA 00:e0:4c:39:2b:0a, HNA 00:0c:46:b8:cc:2c, HNA 00:0a:5e:65:71:ff, HNA 00:1d:92:db:df:8a, HNA 00:1d:92:db:de:91, HNA 16:be:18:57:d3:24, HNA 1c:4b:d6:5c:05:f2, HNA 00:50:fc:cd:fa:c1, HNA 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e, PRIMARY,
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
mmm for all nodes now is quite complex :| here is the one from the node I use to get vis data
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.710s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 69) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 1.450s ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 9) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 11) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 2.790s ( 15) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 15) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.240s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 41) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 0.310s ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 49) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.410s ( 18) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 18) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.260s ( 24) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 24) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.310s (245) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (245) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 1.330s ( 35) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 29) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 35) 00:15:6d:72:48:0d 0.080s ( 45) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:72:48:0d ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 37) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.330s ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 0.970s ( 14) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 11) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 14)
root@OpenWrt:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2011.0.0, MainIF/MAC: wlan0/00:15:6d:7c:09:9e (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.270s (120) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 (102) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (120) 00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 6.960s ( 19) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 19) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 18) 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 6.690s ( 38) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 0.130s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 82) 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 0.400s ( 45) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 45) 00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.370s ( 41) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 38) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 41) 00:15:6d:fd:71:ce 0.370s (255) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce (255) 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 0.890s ( 84) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 ( 0) 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 74) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 84) 00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 1.160s ( 61) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 56) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 61) 00:15:6d:7a:97:08 1.560s ( 31) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce [ wlan0]: 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 ( 28) 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce ( 31)
2011/4/19 Linus Lüssing linus.luessing@web.de:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
moreover the two node have two interfaces used by batman-adv but only one is displayed!
2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89@gmail.com:
Hi!
In Pisa we are switching to batman-adv for our mesh, we use the version packaged in openwrt.
But it seems that the output of vd is not conform to specification in this page http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
especially the box representing a node is painted only for the node where you call 'batctl vd dot'
here you can see what is happening http://eigenlab.org/batman-adv_status.php to simplify visualization i am generating it with 'batctl vd dot -H'
Hi Gioacchino,
As far as I know the format for the batman-adv vis output has not been changed on purpose and the wiki page should reflect the current specification. So you might possibly have found a bug.
So guessing from the link, you are testing this with two nodes (with two interfaces as you said) with perfect link qualities and the issue already comes up, correct?
It would be great if you could provide the following additional data from this two node setup:
- The raw vis output from /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
- The originator table of the two nodes from
/sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/originators
Cheers, Linus
On 21/04/2011 19:47, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
you didn't add your bridge interface to batman, did you?
Yes on Marek suggestion i done batctl if add br-clients
instead of batctl if add eth0
br-clients = bat0 + eth0 [ + ath0 eventually ]
Hi All
Firstly I want to thank all the devs here for the excellent work! I have recently upgraded all my Nodes here in Rural S.Africa as per VT project to B-ADV and it just works.
To Reply on setup question.
here is mine! interfaces: eth0, wifi0( ath0,ath1) UBNT unit.
root@MP-20:/etc/config# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br-lan 8000.00094557a8e5 yes eth0 bat0 ath1
root@MP-20:/etc/config# batctl if ath0: active
As bat0 is already bridged with the other interfaces, it's only required to run Bat-adv on the mesh interface i.e ath0. VAP: ath1 is used as a AP also link-local,with pppoe server all clients,node bridge ip's all static.
Wayne A
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
Gioacchino Mazzurco -
Linus Lüssing -
wayne