[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Paper "Performance Evaluation of BATMAN-adv Wireless Mesh Network Routing Algorithms "
Hi,
Just saw your paper "Performance Evaluation of BATMAN-adv Wireless Mesh Network Routing Algorithms" [1]. Some small questions:
* What is OpenWrt 1703? (you've referenced a batman-adv config tutorial here and there is no such version as OpenWrt 1703) * When did you want to contact the authors of the B.A.T.M.A.N. V implementation in batman-adv about your findings? * How did you solve the cfg80211 bug which returns uninitialized (random) data when asked for the expected throughput of a station? Maybe you remember that the expected throughput is *the value* which B.A.T.M.A.N. V needs to calculate routes. * What batman-adv version was used? * Did you use the openwrt-routing feed (which exact version) for batctl+batman-adv or how did you build it? * Did you generate graphs for the chosen best next hop and how it changes over time in comparison to B.A.T.M.A.N. IV?
Kind regards, Sven
Hi All,
I HATE dealing with ieee.org. Please login. Pay LOTS of money. MAYBE we will get around to you eventually.
I USED to be a member. Waste of $$.
Bitchingly yours, John
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Hi,
Just saw your paper "Performance Evaluation of BATMAN-adv Wireless Mesh Network Routing Algorithms" [1]. Some small questions:
- What is OpenWrt 1703? (you've referenced a batman-adv config tutorial here
and there is no such version as OpenWrt 1703)
- When did you want to contact the authors of the B.A.T.M.A.N. V
implementation in batman-adv about your findings?
- How did you solve the cfg80211 bug which returns uninitialized (random)
data when asked for the expected throughput of a station? Maybe you remember that the expected throughput is *the value* which B.A.T.M.A.N. V needs to calculate routes.
- What batman-adv version was used?
- Did you use the openwrt-routing feed (which exact version) for
batctl+batman-adv or how did you build it?
- Did you generate graphs for the chosen best next hop and how it changes
over time in comparison to B.A.T.M.A.N. IV?
Kind regards, Sven
On Samstag, 4. August 2018 16:39:50 CEST jmh8@nhfn.net wrote:
I HATE dealing with ieee.org. Please login. Pay LOTS of money. MAYBE wewill get around to you eventually.
I USED to be a member. Waste of $$.
Please avoiding switching topics in threads. I've asked some questions about a publication and didn't start a discussion about the commercialization of academic publishing.
This kind of behavior is rather rude towards the authors and might scare them away. It is already hard enough to have some kind of cooperation between scientists and open source developers. Please remember that they are are NOT the IEEE or any other publishing company.
If you want some discussion about this topic then please find a different channel for that and don't steer the discussion away from the original topic.
Kind regards, Sven
Hi all,
Thanks :). You are correct!
Point well made. Would be nice to read paper sometime :).
John
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Samstag, 4. August 2018 16:39:50 CEST jmh8@nhfn.net wrote:
I HATE dealing with ieee.org. Please login. Pay LOTS of money. MAYBE wewill get around to you eventually.
I USED to be a member. Waste of $$.Please avoiding switching topics in threads. I've asked some questions about a publication and didn't start a discussion about the commercialization of academic publishing.
This kind of behavior is rather rude towards the authors and might scare them away. It is already hard enough to have some kind of cooperation between scientists and open source developers. Please remember that they are are NOT the IEEE or any other publishing company.
If you want some discussion about this topic then please find a different channel for that and don't steer the discussion away from the original topic.
Kind regards, Sven
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
jmh8＠nhfn.net -
Sven Eckelmann