The current condition actually does NOT consider bonding when the interface the packet came in from is the soft interface, which is the opposite of what it should do (and the comment describes). Fix that and slightly simplify the condition.
Reported-by: Ray Gibson booray@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich sw@simonwunderlich.de --- routing.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c index 35f76f2..6648f32 100644 --- a/routing.c +++ b/routing.c @@ -443,11 +443,13 @@ batadv_find_router(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
router = batadv_orig_router_get(orig_node, recv_if);
+ if (!router) + return router; + /* only consider bonding for recv_if == BATADV_IF_DEFAULT (first hop) * and if activated. */ - if (recv_if == BATADV_IF_DEFAULT || !atomic_read(&bat_priv->bonding) || - !router) + if (!(recv_if == BATADV_IF_DEFAULT && atomic_read(&bat_priv->bonding))) return router;
/* bonding: loop through the list of possible routers found
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 14:26:56 Simon Wunderlich wrote:
The current condition actually does NOT consider bonding when the interface the packet came in from is the soft interface, which is the opposite of what it should do (and the comment describes). Fix that and slightly simplify the condition.
Reported-by: Ray Gibson booray@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich sw@simonwunderlich.de
routing.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied in revision 47dc789.
Thanks, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org