Sorry was not clear in the configuration
= = AP to AP wireless link ^ ^ AP to client wireless link Server1 and RB1 on wired n/w
My configuration is like this:
-Server 1 --| | |-----(RB1) = = (RB2) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C1 C2
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Gargi Purohit gaargie@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have configured a Layer 2 mesh (Using batman kernel module) on Routerboard 433. These are boards equipped with 2 interfaces. I have configured/created a virtual interface on every physical interface. So for E.g. my routerboard 1 (RB1) has ath0 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode), ath1 (Virtual interface - Master mode), ath2 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode) and ath3 (Virtual interface in Master mode).
My set up has 2 routerboards - one is wired and the other is wireless. Thus RB1 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3 and eth0) RB2 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3)
The proc is as follows on both RB1 and RB2
root@open-mesh:~# cat /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces ath0 ath2
I have created a bridge between all interfaces. The bridge config on RB1 is:
root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000c422fbfe4 no eth0 ath1 ath3 bat0
The bridge config on RB2 is: root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00ff8fffdcc7 no bat0 ath1 ath3
I can connect clients to each of these RB and they can get Internet access.
My configuration is like this:
-------------------Server 1 -------------| | |-------------Wired AP (RB1) = = = = = = = Wireless AP (RB2) | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | C1 (Client of RB1) C2 (Client of RB2)
The APs RB1 and RB2 are connected to each other over 2 mesh wireless links on different channels (ath0 and ath2)
I am trying to ssh to Server 1 from all these nodes. I can ssh to Server 1 from anyone but RB2 (RB1, C1, C2 can ssh Server 1 but RB2 cannot).
Likewise I can ssh all nodes from each other. E.g from anywhere on LAN I can ssh to each of these nodes. But RB2 can be sshed only from nodes directly connected (eg. RB1 and C2).
Note however i can ping Server 1 from RB2.
Am not sure where I am going wrong?
Regards
Gargi
Hey Gargi,
i've read your setup as you described it, and as far as i understood it is supposed to work. I've already built up similar setups without problems and don't see what your problem is here.
Maybe you can provide some more information, e.g. your startup script, to get a clue here?
kind regards, Simon
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:25:08PM -0500, Gargi Purohit wrote:
Sorry was not clear in the configuration
= = AP to AP wireless link ^ ^ AP to client wireless link Server1 and RB1 on wired n/w
My configuration is like this:
-Server 1 --| | |-----(RB1) = = (RB2) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C1 C2
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Gargi Purohit gaargie@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have configured a Layer 2 mesh (Using batman kernel module) on Routerboard 433. These are boards equipped with 2 interfaces. I have configured/created a virtual interface on every physical interface. So for E.g. my routerboard 1 (RB1) has ath0 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode), ath1 (Virtual interface - Master mode), ath2 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode) and ath3 (Virtual interface in Master mode).
My set up has 2 routerboards - one is wired and the other is wireless. Thus RB1 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3 and eth0) RB2 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3)
The proc is as follows on both RB1 and RB2
root@open-mesh:~# cat /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces ath0 ath2
I have created a bridge between all interfaces. The bridge config on RB1 is:
root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000c422fbfe4 no eth0 ath1 ath3 bat0
The bridge config on RB2 is: root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00ff8fffdcc7 no bat0 ath1 ath3
I can connect clients to each of these RB and they can get Internet access.
My configuration is like this:
-------------------Server 1 -------------| | |-------------Wired AP (RB1) = = = = = = = Wireless AP (RB2) | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | C1 (Client of RB1) C2 (Client of RB2)
The APs RB1 and RB2 are connected to each other over 2 mesh wireless links on different channels (ath0 and ath2)
I am trying to ssh to Server 1 from all these nodes. I can ssh to Server 1 from anyone but RB2 (RB1, C1, C2 can ssh Server 1 but RB2 cannot).
Likewise I can ssh all nodes from each other. E.g from anywhere on LAN I can ssh to each of these nodes. But RB2 can be sshed only from nodes directly connected (eg. RB1 and C2).
Note however i can ping Server 1 from RB2.
Am not sure where I am going wrong?
Regards
Gargi
B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
Hey Thanks Simon,
Apparently the kamikaze distribution was screwed up. After hours of debugging I thought of changing the distro last night, and voila it worked fine.
Perhaps they did not have the perfect networking subsystem in the trunk of kamikaze.
Thanks for looking into it though.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Simon Wunderlich simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de wrote:
Hey Gargi,
i've read your setup as you described it, and as far as i understood it is supposed to work. I've already built up similar setups without problems and don't see what your problem is here.
Maybe you can provide some more information, e.g. your startup script, to get a clue here?
kind regards, Simon
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:25:08PM -0500, Gargi Purohit wrote:
Sorry was not clear in the configuration
= = AP to AP wireless link ^ ^ AP to client wireless link Server1 and RB1 on wired n/w
My configuration is like this:
-Server 1 --| | |-----(RB1) = = (RB2) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C1 C2
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Gargi Purohit gaargie@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have configured a Layer 2 mesh (Using batman kernel module) on Routerboard 433. These are boards equipped with 2 interfaces. I have configured/created a virtual interface on every physical interface. So for E.g. my routerboard 1 (RB1) has ath0 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode), ath1 (Virtual interface - Master mode), ath2 (Phy interface - Adhoc mode) and ath3 (Virtual interface in Master mode).
My set up has 2 routerboards - one is wired and the other is wireless. Thus RB1 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3 and eth0) RB2 has (ath0, ath1, ath2, ath3)
The proc is as follows on both RB1 and RB2
root@open-mesh:~# cat /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces ath0 ath2
I have created a bridge between all interfaces. The bridge config on RB1 is:
root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000c422fbfe4 no eth0 ath1 ath3 bat0
The bridge config on RB2 is: root@open-mesh:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00ff8fffdcc7 no bat0 ath1 ath3
I can connect clients to each of these RB and they can get Internet access.
My configuration is like this:
-------------------Server 1 -------------| | |-------------Wired AP (RB1) = = = = = = = Wireless AP (RB2) | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | ^ ^ | C1 (Client of RB1) C2 (Client of RB2)
The APs RB1 and RB2 are connected to each other over 2 mesh wireless links on different channels (ath0 and ath2)
I am trying to ssh to Server 1 from all these nodes. I can ssh to Server 1 from anyone but RB2 (RB1, C1, C2 can ssh Server 1 but RB2 cannot).
Likewise I can ssh all nodes from each other. E.g from anywhere on LAN I can ssh to each of these nodes. But RB2 can be sshed only from nodes directly connected (eg. RB1 and C2).
Note however i can ping Server 1 from RB2.
Am not sure where I am going wrong?
Regards
Gargi
B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknktUQACgkQrzg/fFk7axYNcQCgtVaUb2iudTRj/C6/Eu3d/7Zf qosAn25pa3FNULQ7+lfU2HAHF7vy53+X =Y8vF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
Hi,
Apparently the kamikaze distribution was screwed up. After hours of debugging I thought of changing the distro last night, and voila it worked fine.
Perhaps they did not have the perfect networking subsystem in the trunk of kamikaze.
what version were you using before and what are you using now ? If there is a problem somewhere it has a chance of coming back at some point. :)
Regards, Marek
I am using r1522 2.6.26.5 kernel version and it is good. Earlier I was using r1590 2.6.28.9 kamikaze version (this was faulty).
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Marek Lindner lindner_marek@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
Apparently the kamikaze distribution was screwed up. After hours of debugging I thought of changing the distro last night, and voila it worked fine.
Perhaps they did not have the perfect networking subsystem in the trunk of kamikaze.
what version were you using before and what are you using now ? If there is a problem somewhere it has a chance of coming back at some point. :)
Regards, Marek
B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
Gargi Purohit -
Marek Lindner -
Simon Wunderlich