---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Compile error on openwrt with new patch Date: Tuesday 18 October 2011, 21:11:51 From: Filippo Sallemi tonyputi@gmail.com To: Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org
Ok but i'm using backfire 10.03 with "package" url of feeds.default.conf and in this version the makefile is for batman-adv 2011.2.0.
in my feeds.conf.default i have: src-svn packages svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1 svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/packages
and in svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1 there is batman-adv 2011.2.0 package.
It is a openwrt problem? my feeds.conf.default is the original openwrt conf.
Rgds
2011/10/18 Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org:
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 20:57:53 Filippo Sallemi wrote: [...]
Please create a new checkout of openwrt, add the feed, add batman-adv to the config and build it with V=99 (the clean checkout not an old one). Add the .config and the log to you mail.
Thanks, Sven
This is my make V=99 output after make distclean and however a fresh checkout of openwrt.
No, that wasn't what I asked for.
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/fsallemi/Develop/backfire/feeds/packages/net/batman-adv' gzip -dc /home/fsallemi/Develop/backfire/dl/batman-adv-2011.2.0.tar.gz
What is that? 2011.3.0 with patches from 2011.3.0... this will _not_ work.
| /bin/tar -C | /home/fsallemi/Develop/backfire/build_dir/target-mips_r2_uClibc-0.9.30. | 1/batman-adv/batman-adv-2011.2.0/..
-xf -
Applying ./patches/batman-adv_correctly_set_the_data_field_in_the_TT_REPONSE_packet. patch using plaintext: patching file translation-table.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 1054. Hunk #2 succeeded at 632 with fuzz 2 (offset -448 lines). 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file translation-table.c.rej Patch failed! Please fix ./patches/batman-
adv_correctly_set_the_data_field_in_the_TT_REPONSE_packet.p
atch! make[3]: ***
This is a patch for 2011.3.0 and not for 2011.2.0
[/home/fsallemi/Develop/backfire/build_dir/target-mips_r2_uClibc-0.9.30.1/b atman-adv/batman-adv-2011.2.0/.prepared_d634b3efc2524a3909e7512491480870] Error 1
This says 2011.2.0
[,,,]
Kind regards, Sven
Filippo,
could you please always send your mails to the mailing list ? If you stop sending to the list we don't know what is gloing on.
and in svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1 there is batman-adv 2011.2.0 package.
It is a openwrt problem? my feeds.conf.default is the original openwrt conf.
Yes, it seems that Jow from the OpenWrt team has copied the patches intended for batman-adv 2011.3.0 to 2011.2.0.
@Jow: Could you please revert the comitts 28473 and 28477.
Thanks, Marek
oops sorry
2011/10/18 Marek Lindner lindner_marek@yahoo.de:
Filippo,
could you please always send your mails to the mailing list ? If you stop sending to the list we don't know what is gloing on.
and in svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1 there is batman-adv 2011.2.0 package.
It is a openwrt problem? my feeds.conf.default is the original openwrt conf.
Yes, it seems that Jow from the OpenWrt team has copied the patches intended for batman-adv 2011.3.0 to 2011.2.0.
@Jow: Could you please revert the comitts 28473 and 28477.
Thanks, Marek
Sorry Marek, but how much is stable batman.2011.3.0 ? Can I use it in production?
Rgds
2011/10/18 Filippo Sallemi tonyputi@gmail.com:
oops sorry
2011/10/18 Marek Lindner lindner_marek@yahoo.de:
Filippo,
could you please always send your mails to the mailing list ? If you stop sending to the list we don't know what is gloing on.
and in svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1 there is batman-adv 2011.2.0 package.
It is a openwrt problem? my feeds.conf.default is the original openwrt conf.
Yes, it seems that Jow from the OpenWrt team has copied the patches intended for batman-adv 2011.3.0 to 2011.2.0.
@Jow: Could you please revert the comitts 28473 and 28477.
Thanks, Marek
-- Filippo Sallemi
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 21:26:26 Filippo Sallemi wrote:
Sorry Marek, but how much is stable batman.2011.3.0 ? Can I use it in production?
The release itself is not as stable as we wanted. That's why we added those critical patches and will release version 2011.3.1 in the near future.
Beside those fixed(!!!) problems, no other problem is known. But we cannot guarantee that 2011.3.1 is more stable than 2011.2.0 or that 2011.2.0 is more stable than 2011.3.1.
Kind regards, Sven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Done, sorry for the confusion.
~ Jow
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 21:25:11 Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Done, sorry for the confusion.
Thanks!
I did not know such a "stable" branch existed. If you prefer I can maintain it myself. If so, what are the policies for this branch ?
Regards, Marek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
It was opened a few weeks ago to freeze packages for the Backfire release. It should only receive bugfixes anymore.
~ Jow
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 22:02:16 Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
It was opened a few weeks ago to freeze packages for the Backfire release. It should only receive bugfixes anymore.
Ok, then it should be fine. 2011.2.0 was a bugfix release and we have no open bug reports for it. No need to update it further.
Regards, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
Filippo Sallemi -
Jo-Philipp Wich -
Marek Lindner -
Sven Eckelmann