The macros NLMSG_OK and NLMSG_NEXT operate on the parameter len as if it would be a variable from the type size_t. Using ssize_t (signed size_t) can cause warnings about comparing a signed with an unsigned variable.
It is ok to store the signed len variable in an unsigned variable because an check is used to stop processing when it was negative.
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann sven@open-mesh.com --- functions.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/functions.c b/functions.c index d8d86ce..9e03e72 100644 --- a/functions.c +++ b/functions.c @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static struct ether_addr *resolve_mac_from_cache(int ai_family, size_t buflen; struct nlmsghdr *nh; ssize_t len; - size_t l3_len; + size_t l3_len, mlen; int socknl; int parsed; int finished = 0; @@ -667,8 +667,9 @@ static struct ether_addr *resolve_mac_from_cache(int ai_family, len = resolve_mac_from_cache_dump(socknl, &buf, &buflen); if (len < 0) goto err_sock; + mlen = len;
- for (nh = buf; NLMSG_OK(nh, len); nh = NLMSG_NEXT(nh, len)) { + for (nh = buf; NLMSG_OK(nh, mlen); nh = NLMSG_NEXT(nh, mlen)) { if (nh->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE) { finished = 1; break;
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 12:29:07 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
The macros NLMSG_OK and NLMSG_NEXT operate on the parameter len as if it would be a variable from the type size_t. Using ssize_t (signed size_t) can cause warnings about comparing a signed with an unsigned variable.
It is ok to store the signed len variable in an unsigned variable because an check is used to stop processing when it was negative.
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann sven@open-mesh.com
functions.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied in revision c1ffa59.
Thanks, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org