at Solarfestival in Germany we were reverse engineering some solar tracer charge controllers. so they were part of the local wifi mesh https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/502788487549288448 https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/503888938973802496 https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/503942726292103168
best way for distributing the detailed data (about local sun impact..) was alfred. we used nr. 160 but now simon choosed nr. 3 for that.
https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/503548243452899328
so, plug your solar systems into your mesh-nodes!
https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/503875891735560192 https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/504575102965792768
greetings, ufo
p.s.
code: https://gitorious.org/tracertools/pages/Home
p.p.s.
anyone with CRC expierence?? please! we need help with that dump CRC, please have a look if there is a new idea about used crc
http://pad.freifunk.net/p/solartracer
Am 27.08.14 15:14, schrieb Ufo:
best way for distributing the detailed data (about local sun impact..) was alfred. we used nr. 160 but now simon choosed nr. 3 for that.
all the different values from solar units are now defined on our test systems. and meanwhile EP Solar China gave us some additional hints..
https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/519083918436630528 https://gitorious.org/tracertools/tracertools/source/4a6eb477a850e102f37b6f6...
so the next step should be to include these into alfred?
On Monday 06 October 2014 13:28:11 Ufo wrote:
Am 27.08.14 15:14, schrieb Ufo:
best way for distributing the detailed data (about local sun impact..) was alfred. we used nr. 160 but now simon choosed nr. 3 for that.
all the different values from solar units are now defined on our test systems. and meanwhile EP Solar China gave us some additional hints..
https://twitter.com/rundfreifunk/status/519083918436630528 https://gitorious.org/tracertools/tracertools/source/4a6eb477a850e102f37b6f6 690b0797ec664f36d:tracerstat.c#L26
so the next step should be to include these into alfred?
We basically have two options here:
* integrat the tracetools into the alfred repository, similar to vis and gpsd. Please note that the quality should also be similar and you or your colleagues should be able to maintain that code * keep the package external (e.g. on gitorious), then since we have an external software package now we should start using a number assignment table in wiki to show which software uses which packet type. We could then link from there your software
Any preferences? :)
Cheers, Simon
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
so the next step should be to include these into alfred?
We basically have two options here:
- integrat the tracetools into the alfred repository, similar to vis and
gpsd. Please note that the quality should also be similar and you or your colleagues should be able to maintain that code
- keep the package external (e.g. on gitorious), then since we have an
external software package now we should start using a number assignment table in wiki to show which software uses which packet type. We could then link from there your software
Any preferences? :)
I will definitely keep tracertools a standalone software package as there are many potential use-cases which do not involve alfred. Basically I'm still in the prototyping progress of a bigger system in, tracertools was a part of that effort. Now that other things (using PCF8574A and LTC4151 to monitor and control consumer-grade DC-to-AC inverters via I2C) also work, I will re-work the whole design, both, in terms of hardware I will move away from breadboard and loose wires to a proper shield targetting the WrtNode; in terms of software, tracertools will become a small lib and include handling serial port stuff instead of depending on socat to do that (though using socat has a couple of advantages as well and I may keep the option to pipe stuff through socat). Packages like collectd and alfred can then use libsolartracer to acquire (cached) stats or execute control commands on the charge controller, similar to how libgps is used by alfred. I'm planning to suggest a patch to alfred to optionally use libsolartracer when the time has come for that...
Cheers
Daniel
On Monday 06 October 2014 23:04:28 Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
so the next step should be to include these into alfred?
We basically have two options here:
- integrat the tracetools into the alfred repository, similar to vis and
gpsd. Please note that the quality should also be similar and you or your colleagues should be able to maintain that code
- keep the package external (e.g. on gitorious), then since we have an
external software package now we should start using a number assignment table in wiki to show which software uses which packet type. We could then link from there your software
Any preferences? :)
I will definitely keep tracertools a standalone software package as there are many potential use-cases which do not involve alfred. Basically I'm still in the prototyping progress of a bigger system in, tracertools was a part of that effort. Now that other things (using PCF8574A and LTC4151 to monitor and control consumer-grade DC-to-AC inverters via I2C) also work, I will re-work the whole design, both, in terms of hardware I will move away from breadboard and loose wires to a proper shield targetting the WrtNode; in terms of software, tracertools will become a small lib and include handling serial port stuff instead of depending on socat to do that (though using socat has a couple of advantages as well and I may keep the option to pipe stuff through socat). Packages like collectd and alfred can then use libsolartracer to acquire (cached) stats or execute control commands on the charge controller, similar to how libgps is used by alfred. I'm planning to suggest a patch to alfred to optionally use libsolartracer when the time has come for that...
OK, so at some point you'll probably write an alfred patch which goes into our repo and will make use of your library? That sounds like a good approach to me ... :)
Thank you very much for the feedback, please keep us posted on your proceedings!!
Thanks, Simon
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org