From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan, macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com --- net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c index e257efd..4bf0622 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static bool batadv_dat_send_data(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, }
send_status = batadv_send_unicast_skb(tmp_skb, neigh_node); - if (send_status == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) { + if (send_status == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || send_status == NET_XMIT_CN) { /* count the sent packet */ switch (packet_subtype) { case BATADV_P_DAT_DHT_GET: diff --git a/net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c b/net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c index 0934730..4714b8f 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int batadv_frag_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FRAG_TX_BYTES, skb_fragment->len + ETH_HLEN); ret = batadv_send_unicast_skb(skb_fragment, neigh_node); - if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) { + if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS && ret != NET_XMIT_CN) { /* return -1 so that the caller can free the original * skb */ diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c index 7e8dc64..8edd324 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, goto out;
/* translate transmit result into receive result */ - if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) { + if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) { /* skb was transmitted and consumed */ batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD); batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES, diff --git a/net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c b/net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c index 8af1611..461dbad 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int batadv_tp_send_msg(struct batadv_tp_vars *tp_vars, const u8 *src, if (r == -1) kfree_skb(skb);
- if (r == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) + if (r == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || r == NET_XMIT_CN) return 0;
return BATADV_TP_REASON_CANT_SEND;
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[...]
Not sure how the batman-adv maintainers see this - but this patch needs an additional patch for net-next to also add it to the parts which were rewritten.
Kind regards, Sven
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
What's this mean?
macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +- net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[...]
Not sure how the batman-adv maintainers see this - but this patch needs an additional patch for net-next to also add it to the parts which were rewritten.
Kind regards, Sven
Ok. I would commit another patch to net-next.
Best Regards Feng
On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
What's this mean?
That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
Kind regards, Sven
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
What's this mean?
That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement.
David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
Kind regards, Sven
I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next.
Best Regards Feng
Hello.
On 11/21/2016 3:39 AM, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
Packet.
macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
[...]
diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c index 7e8dc64..8edd324 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, goto out;
/* translate transmit result into receive result */
- if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
- if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) {
Not 'res == NET_XMIT_CN'?
/* skb was transmitted and consumed */ batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD); batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES,
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Hi Sergei,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com wrote:
Hello.
On 11/21/2016 3:39 AM, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
Packet.
Thanks, it was typo.
macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
[...]
diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c index 7e8dc64..8edd324 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, goto out;
/* translate transmit result into receive result */
if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) {
Thanks again. I didn't find it during myself's review and compile process.
Not 'res == NET_XMIT_CN'?
/* skb was transmitted and consumed */ batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD); batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES,
[...]
MBR, Sergei
I have sent the v2 patch which corrects these two typos.
Best Regards Feng
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org