On Friday, 4 January 2019 02.40.06 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:58:32PM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
- /**
* @BATADV_ATTR_AGGREGATED_OGMS: whether the batman protocol messages
* of the mesh mesh interface shall be aggregated or not.
*/
- BATADV_ATTR_AGGREGATED_OGMS,
I'm wondering, would it make sense to take this opportunity to rename this to BATADV_ATTR_AGGREGATION? In case we were adding aggregation support to something other than OGMs in the future.
(and maybe even make it a u32 to be able to potentially use it as a bitfield with a useable length?)
And I know, the generic aggregation patchset was rejected. But on the other hand I don't think that OGMs are that special that they will always be the only packet type worth aggregating.
Any suggestions from Jiri regarding this?
Kind regards, Sven