1 Apr
2011
1 Apr
'11
7:59 p.m.
On Friday 01 April 2011 08:49:19 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
8ffdea813e32cee3c60be36fb9e6a5e077e51ea0 used rcu_read_unlock without using rcu_read_lock when gw_get_selected_gw_node didn't return a valid gw_node.
Applied a slightly modified variant in revision g76eab02.
Thanks, Marek
PS: I prefer the goto patch over the return statement. :-)