it seems table, I saw a really fast dynamic route creation. With batman IV the route took sometime 1 min to come and it was really noisy, i tried many settings, here with V it is good, when I move toward a node it took less than 1 sec to create a new route and the video stream is not interrupted.
Sometime I loose the route it become a little bit noisy when I stop moving but here I suspect a wifi problem, need to change my channel.
I will make more test by adding other nodes on the path of the robot and see how routing is done.
Thank you all :-)
On 07/05/2016 20:09, contact wrote:
I flashed 3 nodes (2 fixe and 1 mobile streaming 2mbits of video data) ,no crash for the moment.
I am making some test to see if all is ok.
Laurent
On 07/05/2016 19:06, contact wrote:
seems ok , I will give a try (I came today at work only to do some mesh testing on moving robots :-) , never have the time during the week ...)
user@ubuntuvm:~/openwrt15011/openwrt$ git -C feeds/routing log commit a3cd8a1729779b8a39336a863ba7f97481e81f5c Author: Marek Lindner mareklindner@neomailbox.ch Date: Sat May 7 20:42:44 2016 +0800
batman-adv: 2016.1 bugfixes & stability updates Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>commit 16ceff232dc58aad799bbb3d98915eb5c78ec2af Author: Axel Neumann neumann@cgws.de Date: Fri May 6 10:35:47 2016 +0200
bmx7: bump version (report channel via topology plugin)On 07/05/2016 19:01, Marek Lindner wrote:
On Saturday, May 07, 2016 18:59:14 contact wrote:
I just updated I need to recompile and re-flash my nodes it takes sometime, can you check please if all your patches are here ?
[..]
Fast-forward ...make-sure-ELP-OGM-orig-MAC-is-updated-on-.patch | 64 ++++++++++++ ...-adv-Avoid-duplicate-neigh_node-additions.patch | 89 +++++++++++++++++ ...Avoid-nullptr-derefence-in-batadv_v_neigh.patch | 38 +++++++ ...an-adv-Fix-refcnt-leak-in-batadv_v_neigh_.patch | 81 +++++++++++++++ ...Fix-double-neigh_node_put-in-batadv_v_ogm.patch | 40 ++++++++ ...initialize-ELP-orig-address-on-secondary-.patch | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++
Looks good. However, comparing git revisions (as Sven suggested) is more precise than posting such logs.
Cheers, Marek