On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 06:01:39 PM Antonio Quartulli wrote:
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ int recv_roam_adv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hard_iface *recv_if) orig_node_free_ref(orig_node); ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS; out:
kfree(skb);
kfree_skb(skb); return ret;
}
I'd say recv_roam_adv() suffers from the same problem you fixed in recv_tt_query() with your previous patch. Wouldn't you say so ?
Cheers, Marek