On sab, apr 30, 2011 at 10:42:26 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
bat_dbg(DBG_BATMAN, bat_priv, "Received BATMAN packet via NB: %pM, IF: %s [%pM] "
"(from OG: %pM, via prev OG: %pM, seqno %d, tq %d, "
"TTL %d, V %d, IDF %d)\n",
"(from OG: %pM, via prev OG: %pM, seqno %d, ttvn %u, "
ethhdr->h_source, if_incoming->net_dev->name, if_incoming->net_dev->dev_addr, batman_packet->orig, batman_packet->prev_sender, batman_packet->seqno,"crc %u, changes %u, td %d, TTL %d, V %d, IDF %d)\n",
batman_packet->tq, batman_packet->ttl, batman_packet->version,
batman_packet->tt_ver_num, batman_packet->tt_crc,
batman_packet->tt_num_changes, batman_packet->tq,
has_directlink_flag);batman_packet->ttl, batman_packet->version,
I think this is the information bisect uses to look for routing loops etc. Do you plan to extend bisect to look for TT problems? Does it make sense to add a new DBG_TT which dumps the adds and removes in the OGM?
I don't think we really need a new log "channel". Till now all the hna operations were printed on DBG_ROUTE, so I think we could continue using it..
The bisect TT extension is not currently planned, but at least it is now supported :)
Regards,