On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:28:07PM -0500, Nathan Wharton wrote:
With the emphasis on minor.
Could: printf(""%s" [label="%d.%d"]\n", be: printf(""%s" [label="%d.%02d"]\n", instead?
What range of values can the pseudo decimal take? Is 2 digit sufficient?
int int_part = TQ_MAX_VALUE / tq; int frac_part = (1000 * TQ_MAX_VALUE / tq) - (int_part * 1000);
I did this using oocalc, so there is no guarantee i got the same rounding errors as using integer arithmetic, but i did scatter a few INT() in the calculations.
tq int_portfrac_port 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 256 0 2 128 0 3 85 333 4 64 0 5 51 200 6 42 666 7 36 571 8 32 0 9 28 444 10 25 600 11 23 272 12 21 333 13 19 692 14 18 285 15 17 66 16 16 0 17 15 58 18 14 222 19 13 473 20 12 800 21 12 190 22 11 636 23 11 130 24 10 666 25 10 240 26 9 846 27 9 481 28 9 142 29 8 827 30 8 533 31 8 258 32 8 0 33 7 757 34 7 529 35 7 314 36 7 111 37 6 918 38 6 736 39 6 564 40 6 400 41 6 243 42 6 95 43 5 953 44 5 818 45 5 688 46 5 565 47 5 446 48 5 333 49 5 224 50 5 120 51 5 19 52 4 923 53 4 830 54 4 740 55 4 654 56 4 571 57 4 491 58 4 413 59 4 338 60 4 266 61 4 196 62 4 129 63 4 63 64 4 0 65 3 938 66 3 878 67 3 820 68 3 764 69 3 710 70 3 657 71 3 605 72 3 555 73 3 506 74 3 459 75 3 413 76 3 368 77 3 324 78 3 282 79 3 240 80 3 200 81 3 160 82 3 121 83 3 84 84 3 47 85 3 11 86 2 976 87 2 942 88 2 909 89 2 876 90 2 844 91 2 813 92 2 782 93 2 752 94 2 723 95 2 694 96 2 666 97 2 639 98 2 612 99 2 585 100 2 560 101 2 534 102 2 509 103 2 485 104 2 461 105 2 438 106 2 415 107 2 392 108 2 370 109 2 348 110 2 327 111 2 306 112 2 285 113 2 265 114 2 245 115 2 226 116 2 206 117 2 188 118 2 169 119 2 151 120 2 133 121 2 115 122 2 98 123 2 81 124 2 64 125 2 48 126 2 31 127 2 15 128 2 0 129 1 984 130 1 969 131 1 954 132 1 939 133 1 924 134 1 910 135 1 896 136 1 882 137 1 868 138 1 855 139 1 841 140 1 828 141 1 815 142 1 802 143 1 790 144 1 777 145 1 765 146 1 753 147 1 741 148 1 729 149 1 718 150 1 706 151 1 695 152 1 684 153 1 673 154 1 662 155 1 651 156 1 641 157 1 630 158 1 620 159 1 610 160 1 600 161 1 590 162 1 580 163 1 570 164 1 560 165 1 551 166 1 542 167 1 532 168 1 523 169 1 514 170 1 505 171 1 497 172 1 488 173 1 479 174 1 471 175 1 462 176 1 454 177 1 446 178 1 438 179 1 430 180 1 422 181 1 414 182 1 406 183 1 398 184 1 391 185 1 383 186 1 376 187 1 368 188 1 361 189 1 354 190 1 347 191 1 340 192 1 333 193 1 326 194 1 319 195 1 312 196 1 306 197 1 299 198 1 292 199 1 286 200 1 280 201 1 273 202 1 267 203 1 261 204 1 254 205 1 248 206 1 242 207 1 236 208 1 230 209 1 224 210 1 219 211 1 213 212 1 207 213 1 201 214 1 196 215 1 190 216 1 185 217 1 179 218 1 174 219 1 168 220 1 163 221 1 158 222 1 153 223 1 147 224 1 142 225 1 137 226 1 132 227 1 127 228 1 122 229 1 117 230 1 113 231 1 108 232 1 103 233 1 98 234 1 94 235 1 89 236 1 84 237 1 80 238 1 75 239 1 71 240 1 66 241 1 62 242 1 57 243 1 53 244 1 49 245 1 44 246 1 40 247 1 36 248 1 32 249 1 28 250 1 24 251 1 19 252 1 15 253 1 11 254 1 7 255 1 3
So it looks like we need a field width of 3, not 2.
BTW: Is a TQ == 0 possible? batctl does not prevent the / 0 from happening.
Andrew