On 2013/12/23 17:06, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
On 23/12/13 09:59, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:46 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
On 23/12/13 06:10, Ding Tianhong wrote:
[...]
--- a/net/batman-adv/originator.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/originator.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int batadv_compare_orig(const struct hlist_node *node, const void *data2) const void *data1 = container_of(node, struct batadv_orig_node, hash_entry);
- return (memcmp(data1, data2, ETH_ALEN) == 0 ? 1 : 0);
- return ether_addr_equal_unaligned(data1, data2) ? 1 : 0;
ether_addr_equal_unaligned() returns a bool value which is implicitly converted to 1 or 0: there is no need for the ternary if anymore.
Should these use batadv_compare_eth?
That makes sense.
I was wondering whether we should get rid of batadv_compare_eth() at all and always use ether_addr_equal_unaligned(). The "unaligned explanation" is part of the name, so there is no need to use a commented helper anymore.
However, until that moment it is better to get stuck to batadv_compare_eth().
Ding, can you also follow Joe's suggestion for this patch please?
Thanks,
Ok