Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org wrote:
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
From: Gao Feng fgao@ikuai8.com
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
What's this mean?
That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement.
David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
Kind regards, Sven
I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next.
Best Regards Feng