15 Dec
2017
15 Dec
'17
5:23 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Sven Eckelmann sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com wrote:
On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 11:57:55 CET Willem de Bruijn wrote:
No, this is also bad because batman_adv.h is MIT license and packet.h is GPL-2. So what other name would you suggest for packet.h? batman_adv_packet.h?
Sure, that sounds great. Thanks.
Really? Isn't include/uapi/linux/batman_adv_packet.h looking like an accident which never should have had happened?
My only point was that renaming and modifying existing uapi files can break userspace compilation.
As long as the existing files are not changed, I don't have a strong opinion on naming for new files.