On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 20:06:27 Mitar wrote:
I was more curious about the bandwidth routing than the latency stuff. The current routing algorithm already takes latency into account. An alternate path always need to be better than the current path. If both paths are equal the faster packets win the race.
Hm. This happens only first time, it does not really change the route latter on, if chosen path latency increases and becomes worse than the second path, but packet loss stays the same (zero). Or it does?
No, it always works. The slower route needs to be better than the faster route. If there is a new "faster" route the same applies. Just give it a try and see for yourself.
Cheers, Marek