2 Dec
2013
2 Dec
'13
4:20 p.m.
From: Antonio Quartulli antonio@meshcoding.com Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:50:46 +0100
This may work with the structures I reported in a previous email, but it is not a good solution for us because we have other more complex substructs that cannot be packed that way.
I think we will simply duplicate the members and avoid substructs in our packets.
I would strongly suggest just making everything a multiple of 4 bytes in size.