11 Apr
2014
11 Apr
'14
7:03 a.m.
On 10/04/14 19:13, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 17:46 +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
What about drivers with HW rate control?
True, they do not implement the rate_control_ops API.
Therefore, as discussed on IRC, I need to move this new API at the mac80211 level, so that each driver can implement it the way it prefer.
Well, not *move*, but rather have both. Or you can just say that the drivers that may need this can worry about it ...
You are right, I meant to *add* another API at the mac80211 level and have both. I think this is the cleanest solution.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli