28 Jan
2019
28 Jan
'19
1:50 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:39:40PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
Chieh-Min Wang chiehmin18@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is the same issue as this one.
Yes, likely.
I see.
I don't think letting the packet go through is a good idea. Not sure NAT will work fine, packets would go through being unmangled? I think we should still drop the packet until we fix this.