On Friday 12 February 2016 14:51:32 Andreas Pape wrote:
From 2b90abdf53e9ab09d9acfd141c7225de1ae16719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Pape apape@phoenixcontact.com Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] batman-adv: Prevent mutliple ARP replies sent by gateways in bla setups with dat enabled
This patch shall make sure that only the backbone gw which has claimed the remote destination for the ARP request answers the ARP request directly if the MAC address is known due to the local DAT table. This prevents multiple ARP replies in a common backbone if more than one gateway already knows the remote mac searched for in the ARP request.
This patch looks good in general. I can not apply it though, please check the links that Sven posted how to set up your mail client to send patches. Also, the commit message seems to have too long lines. Usually your git client should limit those to ~72 characters per line (I'm not sure about the actual limit)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Pape apape@phoenixcontact.com
net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.h | 6 +++ net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 14 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c b/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c index 0a6c8b8..c70363d 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c @@ -1906,3 +1906,61 @@ out: batadv_hardif_put(primary_if); return 0; }
+/**
- batadv_check_local_claim
You should put a short description here, like
batadv_check_local_claim - check if the address has been claimed by the local backbone
- @bat_priv: the bat priv with all the soft interface information
- @addr: mac address of which the claim status is checked
- @vid: the VLAN ID
- batadv_check_local_claim:
Please remove the repetition of the function name
- addr is checked if this address is claimed by the local device itself.
- If the address is not claimed at all, claim it.
- returns true if bla is disabled or the mac is claimed by the device
- returns false if the device addr is already claimed by another gateway
- */
Should put Return: and then describe the return values. Please check the other functions for reference.
kerneldoc is parsed automatically and must therefore be in the right format.
+bool batadv_bla_check_local_claim(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, uint8_t *addr, unsigned short vid) +{
struct batadv_bla_claim search_claim;struct batadv_bla_claim *claim = NULL;struct batadv_hard_iface *primary_if = NULL;bool ret = true;if (atomic_read(&bat_priv->bridge_loop_avoidance)) {
You can save an intendation by doing a return here immediately
primary_if = batadv_primary_if_get_selected(bat_priv);if (!primary_if)return ret;
I'd prefer a goto here. If we have other stuff to clean up when we change this function later, we may forget that this is not done because we used return here.
/* First look if the mac address is claimed */ether_addr_copy(search_claim.addr, addr);search_claim.vid = vid;claim = batadv_claim_hash_find(bat_priv,&search_claim);/* If there is a claim and we are not owner of the claim,* return false;*/if (claim) {if (!batadv_compare_eth(claim->backbone_gw->orig,primary_if->net_dev->dev_addr)) {
ret = false;}
braces not needed
} else {/* If there is no claim, claim the device */batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_BLA, bat_priv, "No claimfound for %pM. Claim mac for us.\n",
search_claim.addr);
Maybe put something in the debug code where this was called from? This looks like a very generic claim message.
batadv_handle_claim(bat_priv,primary_if,- primary_if->net_dev->dev_addr, addr,
vid);
I wonder if we should rename the function somehow, since actively claiming goes beyond "just checking". Maybe handle_local_claim.?
Also, primary_if can go on the line above I guess.
Cheers, Simon