On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:36 PM, andrew.lunn@ascom.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: battlemesh-bounces@ml.ninux.org [mailto:battlemesh- bounces@ml.ninux.org] On Behalf Of Juliusz Chroboczek Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 2:10 PM To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN
The metric is simply based on TQ. C=S will probably have a better local TQ than C'-S because of the load balancing over the two links,
Sorry for the confusion, I used < = > to mark a different frequency than < - >. There's only the one link between C and S, it's just using a different (non-interfering) frequency.
Ah, O.K.
Humm, the answer stays the same :-)
C=S will probably have a better TQ if it is not getting as much interference due to collisions. A will get to know about this in the path TQ. Better still, B-C will also probably have a better TQ, since the link C=S is not interfering with it. So the path TQ is even better. A gets all this.
How do you compute the TQ?
-- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."