On Sunday 04 April 2010 13:10:12 you wrote:
Thanks a lot for the help Sven.
My patch didn't include changes to bat_sysfs.c, where are this changes coming from? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious.
Correct, that was part of the redoing of your changes. bat_sysfs.c is only part of the current development version and not in your patch (you still had the /proc stuff).
But maybe you could explain to Marek why it is important/correct/good/... to have no whitespaces before \n or if the part for /proc or /sys files can be ignored.
Best regards, Sven