hi batman list,
i recently saw there is a bounce of email in the batman community regarding patches. is it safe and reliable to use the version from the open-mesh.org site:
- inux 3.6 => batman-adv 2012.3.x (get batctl 2012.3.x from here)
for production use onto the following configuration:
os: debian 6.0.6 kernel: 3.6.3, batman activated arch: geode lx and amd64
thanks for a brief answer.
walter
-----Original Message----- From: B.A.T.M.A.N [mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces@lists.open-mesh.org] On Behalf Of Antonio Quartulli Sent: Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 12:17 To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 16/16] batman-adv: add kernel-doc for enum batadv_dbg_level
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli ordex@autistici.org --- net/batman-adv/main.h | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/batman-adv/main.h b/net/batman-adv/main.h index 9b94f05..897ba6a 100644 --- a/net/batman-adv/main.h +++ b/net/batman-adv/main.h @@ -165,12 +165,19 @@ int batadv_algo_register(struct batadv_algo_ops *bat_algo_ops); int batadv_algo_select(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, char *name); int batadv_algo_seq_print_text(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset);
-/* all messages related to routing / flooding / broadcasting / etc */ +/** + * enum batadv_dbg_level - available log levels + * @BATADV_DBG_BATMAN: OGM and TQ computations related messages + * @BATADV_DBG_ROUTES: route added / changed / deleted + * @BATADV_DBG_TT: translation table messages + * @BATADV_DBG_BLA: bridge loop avoidance messages + * @BATADV_DBG_ALL: the union of all the above log levels */ enum batadv_dbg_level { BATADV_DBG_BATMAN = BIT(0), - BATADV_DBG_ROUTES = BIT(1), /* route added / changed / deleted */ - BATADV_DBG_TT = BIT(2), /* translation table operations */ - BATADV_DBG_BLA = BIT(3), /* bridge loop avoidance */ + BATADV_DBG_ROUTES = BIT(1), + BATADV_DBG_TT = BIT(2), + BATADV_DBG_BLA = BIT(3), BATADV_DBG_ALL = 15, };
-- 1.7.12.4