On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Marek Lindner lindner_marek@yahoo.de wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 17:17:47 Benjamin Henrion wrote:
Maybe "algorithm" is a big word for a little feature like that. The bonding and interface alternating basically work in two steps:
1) detect that a neighbor is reachable via two different links 2) use the two different links for various manipulations (bonding, interface alternation)
Hoping over the same frequency should be made costly.
Do you add a cost if the packet comes from the same wireless interface?
Since this question keeps coming up and also seems to be the reason for the confusion, let me make it clear once more: There is no special protocol treatment in any way. No added cost, no protocol change, no magic commandline switches, etc. It simply is not necessary!
This concept is so plain simple that everybody keeps wondering what we are hiding. You are looking for something that is not there.
So on which interface the packet is gonna be transmitted?
-- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."