20 Jan
2015
20 Jan
'15
8:28 a.m.
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 09:01:54 Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
It already does that in the first line of the if statement. Your modification only checks this earlier, but because no data from the packet is accessed before the length check, it should not matter when we do this. Or am I missing the point?
Sorry, only looked with one eye at the patch when I came in this morning. So I missed the first line.
Kind regards, Sven