On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:21:37AM -0700, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 26 May 2013 06:57, Antonio Quartulli ordex@autistici.org wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:27:50PM +0300, Mihail wrote:
From: "mihail.costea90@gmail.com" mihail.costea90@gmail.com
Added IPv6 functionality to generic functions implemented in the first patch.
avoid references to "first"/"second"/"third" patch. Once committed, they will just be some patches in the list. You can either explicitly mention the name of the patch ("writing the subject in this way") or just saying previously/whatever else.
ACK
Signed-off-by: Mihail Costea mihail.costea90@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa Stefan.A.Popa@intel.com Reviewed-by: Stefan Popa Stefan.A.Popa@intel.com
distributed-arp-table.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- types.h | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/distributed-arp-table.c b/distributed-arp-table.c index b2ca7e0..42118be 100644 --- a/distributed-arp-table.c +++ b/distributed-arp-table.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ #include "unicast.h"
static char *batadv_dat_types_str_fmt[] = {
"%pI4",
"%pI4", "%pI6c",better going on a new line rather than putting both on the same one (like the array declared in the gateway code).
ACK
};
static void batadv_dat_purge(struct work_struct *work); @@ -173,6 +173,10 @@ static size_t batadv_sizeof_dat_data(uint8_t data_type) switch (data_type) { case BATADV_DAT_IPV4: return sizeof(__be32); +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
case BATADV_DAT_IPV6:return sizeof(struct in6_addr);+#endif default: return 0; } @@ -295,6 +299,12 @@ static uint32_t batadv_hash_dat_ipv4(const void *data, uint32_t size) return batadv_hash_dat(data, BATADV_DAT_IPV4, size); }
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) +static uint32_t batadv_hash_dat_ipv6(const void *data, uint32_t size) +{
return batadv_hash_dat(data, BATADV_DAT_IPV6, size);+} +#endif
/**
- batadv_dat_entry_hash_find - look for a given dat_entry in the local hash
@@ -393,6 +403,11 @@ static void batadv_dat_entry_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, void *data, case BATADV_DAT_IPV4: choose = batadv_hash_dat_ipv4; break; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
case BATADV_DAT_IPV6:choose = batadv_hash_dat_ipv6;break;+#endif
mh...I was just wondering: for the hash functions it would be nice to re-use the same "array approach" that you used for the printing format.
So we would have an array of function pointers to reference rather than having this switch block...What do you think?
I think it would be possible to do this for many other "variable" parameters if required.
Should there be a struct that contains all of them, like:
struct batadv_dat_data { char *format; signature *hash_function; ....... }
And after that the array with the initialization for all types. Or should they be declared as arrays that have nothing in common? Like just adding a new array for the choose functions.
I guess you replied to the same email twice. However, the idea of 1 array of structs is nice! I like it :)