On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:47:53AM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
+fallback_throughput:
- last_tp_run_jiffies = jiffies - neigh->bat_v.last_tp_meter_run;
- last_tp_run_msecs = jiffies_to_msecs(last_tp_run_jiffies);
- /* check the tp_meter_running flag before checking the timestamp to
* avoid a race condition where a new tp meter session is scheduled
* right after the previous tp meter session has completed
*/
- if (!neigh->bat_v.tp_meter_running &&
last_tp_run_msecs > BATADV_ELP_TP_RUN_INTERVAL)
batadv_v_elp_tp_start(neigh);
- /* discard too old tp test results */
- if (last_tp_run_msecs > 2 * BATADV_ELP_TP_RUN_INTERVAL)
neigh->bat_v.tp_meter_throughput = 0;
So far we were either using time_before(), time_after_eq() or our own wrapper batadv_has_timed_out(). Would it make sense to use some of these here, too?