On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:40 PM, marco tozzini wrote:
marco tozzini wrote:
from my laptop fping -c 1000 -g 192.168.2.200/30
and this is the results 192.168.2.200 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/928/7%, min/avg/max = 1.23/2.04/92.8 192.168.2.201 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/759/24%, min/avg/max = 1.28/3.11/27.5 192.168.2.203 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/766/23%, min/avg/max = 1.33/3.36/38.7
Just for completeness ... here it is (almost) the same test with OLSRd
192.168.2.200 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/902/9%, min/avg/max = 1.27/2.39/35.3 192.168.2.201 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/815/18%, min/avg/max = 1.28/3.80/73.6 192.168.2.203 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/821/17%, min/avg/max = 1.31/3.56/122
which proves that batman finds better routes ;-))))
LOL, sorry could not resist :) (joke!)
you obviously have a different problem here than routing protocols.