[B.A.T.M.A.N.] lxc and batman

Sven Eckelmann sven at narfation.org
Thu Sep 15 16:17:19 CEST 2011

On Thursday 15 September 2011 08:40:15 clownix at clownix.net wrote:
> So, for the multiplication of machines in a big network, you confirm that
> batman-adv is not compatible with lxc.

I never said that it is not compatible with lxc

> However something is still not clear: with one batman-adv per namespace,
> would it be possible to have what you have with kvm but with lxc?

No, this is not possible by definition. kvm == multiple batman-adv instances, 
batman-adv in lxc == one instance with interfaces in different namespaces.

> The gain for this work would be only performance, the useful scenario
> being no other than what you have with kvm: big (independant) networks.

No, by definition those networks aren't independent as they share resources 
inside batman-adv (and many other resources).

As far as I understand: You want to create batman-adv interfaces in different 
namespaces without having colliding names. Feel free to submit patches for it 
(or enthuse some developers with spare time).

But I am still waiting for an actual usage scenario. KVM is mostly used for 
debugging purposes... something were we want to have separate instances which 
don't crash the developer machine. And I don't see the reason for having the 
overhead of batman-adv in all namespaces instead of a single entry/exit point.

Kind regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/attachments/20110915/9bea5d06/attachment.pgp>

More information about the B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list