[B.A.T.M.A.N.] sysfs compat
fboehm at aon.at
Tue May 4 13:13:18 CEST 2010
Of course you are right Marek. I don't want to stay with 2.6.14 and will
switch to a kernel >2.6.21 asap.
I wanted to say that it's suddenly more a general problem using chip
supplier or third party SDK's for embedded systems and being constrained
to use quite old kernels.
Marek Lindner schrieb:
>> Marek, i've tested your patches with all major kernel releases from 2.6.20
>> to 2.6.33. What i have seen is:
>> * 2.6.20 fails for various reasons
>> * 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 show some warnings
>> * all other kernel versions are fine
>> The warnings for 23 and 24 can be fixed by moving the *_read() defines
>> from "< 2.6.25" to "< 2.6.23". If you integrate this modification into
>> your patch, you will gain my blessing and my sign-off. :)
> thanks for testing. I followed your suggestion before pushing the patches. :)
> Since 2.6.20 does not work at this point I removed it from the list of
> supported kernel versions. Unfortunately, many embedded system vendors do not
> bother to bring their drivers upstream and instead, publish "code blobs"
> limited to an old linux version. So, it makes sense for us to offer support for
> older versions as well. We could remove old versions if the effort is getting
> too high (as we just did with 2.6.20).
> @Franz: I know you are stuck at 2.6.14 or something similar with your Atheros
> system but I don't think it is feasible for us to "go down" that far (unless
> you find a way). It might be easier to try pushing your Atheros beyong the
> current 2.6.21 minimum.
More information about the B.A.T.M.A.N