[B.A.T.M.A.N.] updated README
sven.eckelmann at gmx.de
Mon May 3 16:37:02 CEST 2010
Marek Lindner wrote:
> > And maybe you should increase "Linux 2.6.20" to "Linux 2.6.21" with your
> > newest backporting efforts.
> I kept the "Linux 2.6.20" in the hope that the recent patches would also
> make our code work on this old release. I just did not test it. Do we have
> reason to believe that it won't work ?
Yes, I tested it some days ago and some structs changed in a way we would have
problems to support them. Unless you have reasons that we need to support them
I would keep that as exercise for the interested reader.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the B.A.T.M.A.N