Hi, personally, I like this one the most. The feedback gathered from bystanders goes into the same direction. Anyone another opinion or suggestions ? Cheers, Marek

On Wednesday 28 September 2011 10:21:57 Simon Wunderlich wrote: A vector version is not really a problem... a clean vector version would be more work ;) Kind regards, Sven

Hello Sven, Franz, wow, so many people volunteering! Sven, thank you for your work! We will need something to give to the print services for the merchandise, but I have no experience which format they will expect. However, I'd suggest to wait with the conversion until we have decided on the final logo. Otherwise we will have to convert again and again ... Thanks! Simon On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0200, fboehm wrote: > Hi guys, > > I would be happy to make you a clean vector version! > Suddenly this is perhaps my only contribution to batman-adv at the > moment :-) > > Regards, > Franz > > > Am 2011-09-28 10:36, schrieb Sven Eckelmann: >> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 10:21:57 Simon Wunderlich wrote: >> >>> BTW, we will also need a vector version from the final logo, anyone >>> volunteering? :) >> A vector version is not really a problem... a clean vector version would be >> more work ;) >> >> Kind regards, >> Sven >

Hi, On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:21:57 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: I can do some tampering with inkscape :) // Hundebøll

Hi, I still prefer the previous version. The separate head requires more attention before the picture becomes clear. At first sight it looks a bit "unusual". IMHO a logo should be "obvious" right from the start. Regards, Marek

attached you find my first try of vectorization and simplification of the smallfeet-version. It has very low vector count but perhaps it's already too much different to the artists concept.

Am 2011-09-29 11:35, schrieb Sven Eckelmann: Thanks Sven! The upper left frame of the glasses has the wrong shape. But perhaps the glasses should anyway be kept more angular shaped as in the original version and also a little bit larger so that they overlap the head more. Perhaps this was the artists intention and I don't want to interpret it wrong :-) But nevertheless I was thinking about two small modifications: - Should the left wing also have a convex curve like the right wing instead of a concave? - Should the ears be a little bit curved like in the vector version or straight lines like in the original version? Regards, Franz

On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:47:04PM +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: I do :-) +1!

mmm the front shape of the two wings is different the front of the left shape is like ) but should be (at moment the whole logo looks like )^-^) but should be like (^-^) sorry to not be so clear but i am not native English speaker, and it's difficult for me to express clearly what i am trying to say, if i have time next days I'll do some sketch to be more clear but i hope you can understand what i am saying without that ;)

yes but this is not a cutted tube for the perspective I think that the shape shouldn't be affected so much, yes it is influenced but not so much like in the logo 2011/10/2 Sven Eckelmann <sven(a)narfation.org>rg>:

Hello Franz, thank you very much for your work! It looks really great and smooth! Sven is currently at my place, so we have worked on some details together: * We've changed the glasses a little in some details * We have added an outline version to have the black logos on black/dark T-Shirts. :) * We have shortened the tail a little so that the outline does not create some "closed holes" * Seems we have decided on the "small" feet Regarding your comments: * I'd like to keep it in the concave version for the left wing. We have tried the convex version (both might be somehow correct ;] ), but we like the original version more. * The ears look great the way you drew them! Our version is uploaded here: http://packetmixer.de/batlogo2/ We should keep the svg version as the "original"/"only" version and convert bitmaps from it if required. I hope everybody liks this version, we can keep this then as the final version. Cheers Simon On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:35:28PM +0200, fboehm wrote: > Am 2011-09-29 11:35, schrieb Sven Eckelmann: > >On Thursday 29 September 2011 07:51:58 fboehm wrote: > >>attached you find my first try of vectorization and simplification of > >>the smallfeet-version. > >>It has very low vector count but perhaps it's already too much different > >>to the artists concept. > >Quite impressive work. I really like it. The wings look extreme good and the > >only "big" difference are the glasses (upper left frame, right earpiece), ears > >and back/tail. > > > >Kind regards, > > Sven > Thanks Sven! > > The upper left frame of the glasses has the wrong shape. But perhaps > the glasses should anyway be kept more angular shaped as in the > original version and also a little bit larger so that they overlap > the head more. Perhaps this was the artists intention and I don't > want to interpret it wrong :-) > > But nevertheless I was thinking about two small modifications: > - Should the left wing also have a convex curve like the right wing > instead of a concave? > - Should the ears be a little bit curved like in the vector version > or straight lines like in the original version? > > Regards, > Franz >