28 May
2009
28 May
'09
5:17 a.m.
Let's say a packet comes from node A interface
ath0 of node B, and
there is a route on node B for the packet to go to node C, route which
use the same interface ath0. In this case, you might want to add a
cost to hop over the same wireless interface.
Ok, good idea. I quickly made a patch:
http://www.open-mesh.net/changeset/1276
Feel free to test it. :-)
Regards,
Marek
But how would batman choose the next hop if at every node there are two
interfaces available. The ideal ofcourse would be
11a->11b->11a->11b->11a on each hop.
Regards
Kartik
29 May
29 May
6:58 a.m.
On Thursday 28 May 2009 13:17:04 Kartik Muralidharan wrote:
But how would batman choose the next hop if at every
node there are two
interfaces available. The ideal ofcourse would be
11a->11b->11a->11b->11a on each hop.
If all nodes have 2 interfaces its hard to predict whether it will be:
11a->11b->11a->11b->11a
or
11b->11a->11b->11a->11b
If the link qualities are all equal batman we choose the fastest path (lowest
latency).
Regards,
Marek
5053
days inactive
5054
days old
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Kartik Muralidharan -
Marek Lindner