Userspace gateway sends TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST when he receives TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST and will not start to send new IP as TUNNEL_DATA --- batman/linux/modules/gateway.c | 1 - batman/linux/modules/gateway24.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/batman/linux/modules/gateway.c b/batman/linux/modules/gateway.c index 154497e..9411575 100644 --- a/batman/linux/modules/gateway.c +++ b/batman/linux/modules/gateway.c @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int packet_recv_thread(void *data)
if(client_data != NULL) {
- buffer[0] = TUNNEL_DATA; memcpy( &buffer[1], &client_data->vip_addr, sizeof( client_data->vip_addr ) );
iov.iov_base = buffer; diff --git a/batman/linux/modules/gateway24.c b/batman/linux/modules/gateway24.c index 585fe85..9b60fe4 100644 --- a/batman/linux/modules/gateway24.c +++ b/batman/linux/modules/gateway24.c @@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int packet_recv_thread(void *data)
if(client_data != NULL) {
- buffer[0] = TUNNEL_DATA; memcpy( &buffer[1], &client_data->vip_addr, sizeof( client_data->vip_addr ) );
iov.iov_base = buffer;
Hello Sven,
It seems that you are always replying to emails of a different thread. The information you send do not belong to my questions. I also have seen that you replay to other threads that is not related to the threads. Please create a new thread instead for you PATCH messages as it would keep the thread in correct order.
Bye Stephan
On Thursday 25 September 2008 11:12:11 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote:
It seems that you are always replying to emails of a different thread. The information you send do not belong to my questions. I also have seen that you replay to other threads that is not related to the threads. Please create a new thread instead for you PATCH messages as it would keep the thread in correct order.
Sry, I haven't replied to any threads with my [PATCH] mails. Please check your mua and the mail headers of my [PATCH] mails. You will notice that there are no In-Reply-To or References in them - just the usual stuff mutt creates for "new" mails and the stuff mailman adds.
Best regards Sven Eckelmann
Hi,
Sry, I haven't replied to any threads with my [PATCH] mails. Please check your mua and the mail headers of my [PATCH] mails. You will notice that there are no In-Reply-To or References in them - just the usual stuff mutt creates for "new" mails and the stuff mailman adds.
When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the following line: "In-Reply-To: 6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" For some reason you are creating emails with that header entry instead without it.
Please also look at the archive at https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September/thread.html. You will see that only your mails are always appended to other threads and are not starting as a new thread. All answers are currently under "[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-exp hang on 95% CPU load" which definitively do not belong to the subject. Please check your environment.
Bye Stephan
--------------------------------------- Dipl.Informatiker(FH) Stephan Enderlein Freifunk Dresden
On Friday 26 September 2008 13:19:19 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote:
[...] When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the following line: "In-Reply-To: 6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" For some reason you are creating emails with that header entry instead without it.
Can you please say which mail you mean? I checked different [PATCH] mails from me (send by mailman back to me) and cannot find it. The only ones which have them are the the real answers to your mails - which off course have references to them.
grep -rli "6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" *|xargs grep Subject 1222335445.3922.Wd6Iu:2,S:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
1222334362.3922.FhPMA:2,RS:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
1222428286.3965.lxuDX:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response o
Please also look at the archive at https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September/thread.html . You will see that only your mails are always appended to other threads and are not starting as a new thread. All answers are currently under "[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-exp hang on 95% CPU load" which definitively do not belong to the subject. Please check your environment.
I have asked dotslash to check it on his machine and he doesn't see my mails in your threads in mutt. It's the same with kmail and probably with many other mail clients. I cannot find the problem on my site so I would say that it is a problem of mailman's archive output. I have contacted the postmaster of open- mesh, but got no answer until now.
Best regards Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 26 September 2008 13:39:30 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2008 13:19:19 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden)
[...] When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the following line: "In-Reply-To: 6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" For some reason you are creating emails with that header entry instead without it.
Can you please say which mail you mean? I checked different [PATCH] mails from me (send by mailman back to me) and cannot find it. The only ones which have them are the the real answers to your mails - which off course have references to them.
grep -rli "6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" *|xargs grep Subject 1222335445.3922.Wd6Iu:2,S:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
1222334362.3922.FhPMA:2,RS:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
1222428286.3965.lxuDX:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response o
To have the same data please download https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz and search for Message-ID: 20080924215939.GA9277@sven-desktop.lazhur.ath.cx This is the first mail which is displayed as answer to your mail inside the threaded archive output. Do you see anything which justifies that this mail is attached to your mail in the thread?
Now search for Message-ID: 6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de This is the mail you wrote that you think that I "answered" to your mail. Do you find the In-Reply-To and References? I do - and this should be the only real reason that your mail is a answer to my mail for a mail reader (and for the archive output of mailman of course).
Best regards, Sven Eckelmann
Hi,
https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz
If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this if you create a new message for the list (not a reply). The mailing list modifies the emails and removes a lot of header entries.
Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and attachments should be avoided.
see: ---------------- Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/attachments/20080912/69d789a...
From sven.eckelmann at gmx.de Fri Sep 12 16:59:45 2008
----------------
/Stephan
--------------------------------------- Dipl.Informatiker(FH) Stephan Enderlein Freifunk Dresden
On Friday 26 September 2008 14:56:17 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote:
https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz
If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this if you create a new message for the list (not a reply). The mailing list modifies the emails and removes a lot of header entries.
I know, but this should be the important fields for mailman hyper-archiver.
Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and attachments should be avoided.
I never send these patches as multipart mails with pgp stuff - just simple text/plain mails
Best regards, Sven
On Friday, 26. September 2008 21:06:16 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and attachments should be avoided.
I never send these patches as multipart mails with pgp stuff - just simple text/plain mails
True, its always "Content-Type: text/plain;".
I have no problem with your mails - they are displayed as expected. :-)
Greetings, Marek
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
-
Marek Lindner -
Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) -
Sven Eckelmann