3 May
2011
3 May
'11
3:56 p.m.
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 17:50:07 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Actually, I liked Andrew's suggestion. So far the HNA handling did not have
its own debug "channel" because it was plain simple - nothing much to debug
there. The advanced handling we are going to add might require debugging in
the future ...
Even if you don't plan to extend bisect at the moment, extra TT debug info
would make it easier to add it later on. I'd be surprised if the current
concept / code "just works". Bugs tend to hide in unexpected places. ;-)
Regards,
Marek
I think this
is the information bisect uses to look for routing loops
etc. Do you plan to extend bisect to look for TT problems? Does it
make sense to add a new DBG_TT which dumps the adds and removes in the
OGM?
I don't think we really need a new log "channel". Till now all the hna
operations were printed on DBG_ROUTE, so I think we could continue using
it..