On Wednesday 26 August 2009 18:52:34 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> stateless proactive adhoc networking protocol
> Does not sound too bad in my opinion. Other opinions ?
Not the nicest of acronym. It would be good to be able to build a
short, 3 letter abbreviation of the acronym for the network device
name. That is one thing that batman->bat0 has going for it.
Well, we safely can omit the last "p" to make it "span".
span0 looks fine to me. ;-)
By the way, I was referring to the protocol name and not to the
implementation's name. Sven pointed out that the protocol and the
implementation share the same name which is a bit confusing.
Feel free to make alternative suggestions. :-)