You are right - the situation still is a bit messy. I think Andrew
has a point
saying that "adv" might be rejected. I even could imagine that the name
"batman" causes some irritation. ;-)
A while back Justin Dean suggested a new name for the protocol:
stateless proactive adhoc networking protocol
Does not sound too bad in my opinion. Other opinions ?
Not the nicest of acronym. It would be good to be able to build a
short, 3 letter abbreviation of the acronym for the network device
name. That is one thing that batman->bat0 has going for it.