On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:12:19PM +0200, Marek Lindner wrote:
On Monday, July 30, 2012 12:07:04 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
And why is this explanation not part of the commit message ?
Because it is left as exercise for the reader ;-) Actually I didn't mention it because the Ap-Isolation part is a "consequence". What this patch wants to fix is an issue in the client entry state consistency, regardless of the semantic of such state.
Anyhow, if you think it is worth adding it, I will do that.
Well, we need some explanations *why* we want this change. The way you are describing it now it sounds like we want to preserve all relevant flags during the transition from local to global client and vice versa ?
Yes, that is the message I had in mind while writing the commit message. But ok, I will send v2 and I'll be more verbose in order to let people understand what this issue could lead to.