Hi,
On 04/18/2012 12:27 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
in various scenarios it would be possible that a node receives an ADD event for a client it already knows to belong to the advertiser. In this case the node has to update the global entry ttvn with the one carried by the OGM.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulliordex@autistici.org
translation-table.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/translation-table.c b/translation-table.c index cd6c2dd..ab295ee 100644 --- a/translation-table.c +++ b/translation-table.c @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ int tt_global_add(struct bat_priv *bat_priv, struct orig_node *orig_node, bool wifi) { struct tt_global_entry *tt_global_entry = NULL;
- struct tt_orig_list_entry *orig_entry; int ret = 0; int hash_added;
@@ -640,9 +641,17 @@ int tt_global_add(struct bat_priv *bat_priv, struct orig_node *orig_node, tt_global_entry->roam_at = 0; }
if (!tt_global_entry_has_orig(tt_global_entry, orig_node))
orig_entry = tt_global_entry_has_orig(tt_global_entry,orig_node);if (!orig_entry) tt_global_add_orig_entry(tt_global_entry, orig_node, ttvn);else/* if we are "adding" global entry, we may want to* update the ttvn anyway. Perhaps the global entry is* here with a wrong ttvn because it was temporary added* before */
One more bad-ending comment block :)